• Articles
  • Motorcycles for Sale
  • Motorcycle Parts
  • Motorcycle Manuals
  • Models
  • Collectibles
  • Contact

The Kneeslider

Doers Builders and Positive People

Honda Powered Twisted Trike

By Paul Crowe

Honda Powered Twisted Trike

Honda Powered Twisted TrikeWith all of the trike interest these days, here’s another take on a 3 wheeler. Put a 1000cc Honda inline 4 motorcycle engine into a TIG welded tube frame built just 2 tubes short of SCCA specs, add rack and pinion steering, Wilwood brakes, 6 point harness, Momo F1 type steering wheel and what do you get? You get what the boys at Twisted Trikes call a UDO, an Unidentified Driving Object. The body is carbon fiber and kevlar, the whole thing weighs 650 pounds and is within 10 pounds of equal weight on all three wheels.

For those looking for near sportbike performance with the stability of three wheels, here’s an idea. The build took one and a half years of spare time work. Looks like time well spent.

More photos and link below:

Honda Powered Twisted Trike

Honda Powered Twisted Trike

Link: Twisted Trikes
See also: Motorcycle Powered Cars

Posted on May 28, 2008 Filed Under: Motorcycle Builders, Three Wheel Vehicles


-- Subscribe to The Kneeslider --

Be the first to know when something’s new!


Be sure to check out The Kneeslider’s motorcycle manuals and literature listings.

Your purchases through ebay links on The Kneeslider may earn a commission for this site.




« Harley Davidson Online Customizer
American Ironhorse Has A New Owner »

Comments

  1. Shaine says

    May 28, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Great looking ride – but would it be road legal? ’cause track days can get expense.

  2. Shaine says

    May 28, 2008 at 11:40 am

    And then I followed the linked provided… and it is street legal (maybe not in Alberta, Canada).

  3. dave says

    May 28, 2008 at 11:43 am

    I’d like to see this done with a GL 1800 powerplant. Now THAT would be something to have…

    This is very cool, and interesting though…

  4. Hawk says

    May 28, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    dave Says:
    May 28th, 2008 at 11:43 am
    I’d like to see this done with a GL 1800 powerplant. Now THAT would be something to have…

    With a blower, Dave?

  5. Chris says

    May 28, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    That’s the most ridiculous piece of non engineering out there. Look at the way the front bike shocks are tilted inward to decrease the spring rate. Very economical, but I cannot even imagine the bending loads on those dampers. Why they didn’t take the time to design a proper pushrod system is beyond me.

    That’s the first visible shortcut. I hope the rest of the vehicle doesn’t contain similar…um…engineering. These guys could kill themselves.

  6. todd says

    May 28, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    Chris, the shocks pivot on bolts at both ends; no bending loads. This is a common application for shocks.

    This looks like a lot of fun and quite a bit of work (and engineering) went into it. Yep, in California and many other states the DMV and highway patrol would consider it a CBR1000 with a side car. Perfectly legal.

    -todd

  7. PUSkunk says

    May 28, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    This looks awesome, I want to either buy one of these, or build it. The Can-Am Spyder is a good start, but a little too snowmobile-ish for me.

  8. Sean says

    May 28, 2008 at 4:23 pm

    I love every angle of it, except the rear lights. What the bloody hell were they thinking?

  9. dave says

    May 28, 2008 at 4:28 pm

    Hawk says:

    With a blower, Dave?…

    Hells YEAH! Or maybe twin turbos…

    Actually, I’d take the whole frame assy off an 1800, and build the ‘trike’ around it. Single side swingarm, shaft drive, yada-yada…

    seems like you know who I am, Hawk… ?

  10. dave says

    May 28, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    I’d prolly two-up it as well…. Fighter-plane style…

  11. Joe says

    May 28, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    You have to watch out when your mounting spherical ball joints out of position. (EX. front control arms) They are not meant to be loaded that way. Good Luck.

  12. OTTO MANN says

    May 28, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    “I WANT ONE NOW”

  13. Tim says

    May 28, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    I would LOVE a few laps round my local track in one.

  14. JC says

    May 28, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    My memory could be wrong, but I recall that three wheel vehicles tend to be quite weight biased towards the front two wheels.

  15. pabsy says

    May 28, 2008 at 7:12 pm

    the engineering is pretty sound, unlike the armchair critics these guys got off their butts and did something
    congrats it looks like an absolute blast

  16. mark says

    May 28, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    it looks like a great start and i wish the
    guys lots of luck with their project.

    any ideas on the aero balance on this puppy?

    personally, i think that they have a long way
    to go to catch, say the t-rex. or a ‘busa
    powered super 7. however, neat stuff.

  17. MadScience says

    May 29, 2008 at 12:55 am

    Very close to the same layout I’ve been playing with. I really love this design.

    I’d like to see some more body work around the engine, a formula 1 style scoop for the intake, and the exhaust shortened and hung under the bike (like a Buell).

    And please, please remove those tail lights. I can think of dozens of options less hideous than those.

  18. GenWaylaid says

    May 29, 2008 at 1:16 am

    I love the basic idea behind this trike. It would be a huge pain to make a four-wheeled track car road legal, but subtract one wheel and a whole lot of hassle goes with it.

    Sure, it may not be up to the latest safety standards, but I say that anyone who is ballsy enough to take this thing out on the highway deserves the chance to. Besides, track safety gear is really good at protecting the driver, as long as you don’t hit a tree, or a sign, or oncoming traffic…

  19. zipidachimp says

    May 29, 2008 at 4:54 am

    geez! I know too late I shoulda gone to tech school instead of college. shoulda learnt welding!
    I like this better than the can-am spyder.

  20. ROHORN says

    May 29, 2008 at 11:26 am

    You can always learn to weld – and get a set of Indycycle plans….

  21. Chris says

    May 29, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    Of course the shocks pivot at both ends, but mounting them at those extreme angles puts the bending moment right on the seals. I understand why they did it: to decrease the spring rate and gain more travel. But it is a really bad approach. The falling rate of that suspension must be insane.

    Rest assured, the engineering is not sound. You want to see a well engineered, well fabricated trike, check out Joe’s http://www.lehighvalleychoppers.com.

    Personally, I’ve never armchaired anything. Have a look at my website: a scratch-built car and two cafe racers that were virtually built from scratch.

  22. pabsy says

    May 29, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    we’ll differ but thanks for the link very enjoyable

  23. JohnnyStone says

    May 31, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Do you guys know the SportCycle?
    http://www.sportcycle.info/
    Its a very similar vehicle, and it seems to be older.
    I just believe that it only needs a better design…

  24. Justin R says

    June 2, 2008 at 4:41 am

    2 tubes short? They did that on purpose.
    Anyone think we’ll see a future for full-blown trike racing?
    The concept seems sound, the use of fuel would not be as demanding depending on the powerplant, etc etc
    Plenty of ppl can make their own too!

    I’m new to Kneeslider and I have to to say, I like all of the brains I’ve seen represented on here and its great to have a place to rationally discuss with other ppl such things as these. 😀

  25. Joe says

    June 2, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    I agree with Justin R. There are a lot of talented people who visit this site and other similar sites. Hat’s off to Paul and what he brings to all of us. You/we all have to remember, when WE put our product out to the public for viewing or for sale, it is going to be looked over with some talented eye’s. The word “GOOD” or well “ENGINEERED” are some very big words, depending on what your describing. There are some very, well meaning people, who do not have the experience on certain builds “basic engineering 101” who think their product is just fine. Sooner or later, we all eat some humble pie. I am not directing this to anyone in particular. It is for all of us who build anything. Take the views from all of us, who take the time to post a comment and learn from it. Joe

Subscribe to The Kneeslider

Be the first to know when something's new!

Search articles on The Kneeslider


Do You need motorcycle parts?

Everything from normal maintenance items to hard to find out of production parts, look here first.
Be very specific for best results! Use part numbers if you have them.


Be sure to check out The Kneeslider’s new motorcycle manuals and literature listings.



Your purchases through ebay links on The Kneeslider may earn a commission for this site.



From The Kneeslider Archives

Triumph Scrambler - British Army version from Classic Farm Motorcycles

British Army Triumph Scrambler from Classic Farm Motorcycles

Gunbus 410

Gunbus 410 Cubic Inch V-Twin Motorcycle Completed

RSS What’s happening on HorsePowerSports

  • DeLorean Motor Company is Coming Back with an Electric
  • Ford Shares Open Source CAD Files for 3D Printing Truck Accessories
  • If You Need a New Car, Buy an Old One Instead

Motorcycle Engine Powered Cars

Copyright © 2025 · The Kneeslider · Website by Crowe Computer Services
US Army veteran owned and operated
This website proudly Made in the USA!
Made in the USA