• Articles
  • Motorcycles for Sale
  • Motorcycle Parts
  • Motorcycle Manuals
  • Models
  • Collectibles
  • Contact

The Kneeslider

Doers Builders and Positive People

Kestrel Falcon from Falcon Motorcycles

By Paul Crowe

Kestrel Falcon from Falcon Motorcycles
Kestrel Falcon from Falcon Motorcycles

Falcon Motorcycles unveiled the second installment in their Concept 10 series, the Kestrel Falcon, at the Quail Motorcycle Gathering in Carmel, California. Like their first, the Bullet Falcon, it started life from broken remains, in this case, an engine with a damaged gearbox from a 1970 Triumph Bonneville plus ten inches of the original headstock and down tube. Everything else is fabricated by hand. They’re committed to not using and thereby destroying complete existing motorcycles, instead they begin with derelict engines around which they complete their vision.

Work started with the 750cc twin cylinders, machined in-house, using a 5-axis CNC machine and a solid block of 7075 aerospace grade 6061 T-651 extruded aluminum (see comment below) which was designed to taper the round fins at the bottom to the original Triumph diamond-shaped heads.

Kestrel Falcon aluminum cylinders
Kestrel Falcon aluminum cylinders machined from scratch

Ian Barry cut the unit construction engine in half, removed the damaged gear box and completely re-engineered it to fit and function perfectly with a BSA A-10 transmission. The engine was then carefully reshaped with new contours and aluminum-welded together to various pieces of his new design, using a jig that he made for the engine case.

Overall, it took more than 2,000 hours of hand-machining, stretching, hammering, rolling and hand-carving to create the rest of the motorcycle. The gas and oil tanks started as hammered sheets of metal hand-formed around wooden molds, the exhausts, handlebars, levers, seat, fender…even the bolts were created from scratch from blocks, sheets and rods of steel, brass, aluminum.

Whilst Falcon Motorcycles are not intended as touring bikes or daily drivers, the function and engineering of the motorcycle is Ian’s primary focus when building his motorcycles, which have been likened to works of art, due to their high levels of craftsmanship. “The biggest challenge, and the thing that ultimately drives me is assuring reliability, and safe engineering, whilst figuring out new ways to engineer flowing, classic lines that draw attention from the pure functionality of the bike. It’s not easy to do, and often a lot of ideas have to be flushed out before getting to the point where form and function actually do meet.” – Ian said.

Kestrel Falcon front brake
Kestrel Falcon front brake

I’ve noticed comments elsewhere criticizing this build for being high priced art in contrast to meeting some definition of what a “real” motorcycle should be and when examining the individual components they do seem to fit the image, but is there some law that states functional motorcycles can’t be finished to this degree? Though custom motorcycles have recently passed through an era of “style first, function maybe,” this bike seems to exhibit a much higher build quality than a great many that fell into that category and the builder was intent on retaining sufficient functionality to allow the owner to ride it whenever he wishes, though it will likely see limited street duty. Any 2000+ hour build to this level of hand crafted quality will necessarily command a high price and few will have the opportunity to own one. Criticizing this one off machine because the owner may choose not to ride it frequently seems to miss the mark.

Kestrel Falcon primary
Kestrel Falcon primary

In a recent interview, Ian Barry made reference to the Brough Superior as an example of a no compromise name still highly treasured today, similar to the concept behind Falcon. Will Falcon Motorcycles rise to that level? Only the passage of many years will answer the question. Lofty goals alone are certainly not enough, even years of painstaking work and dedication offer no guarantee, but one thing is certain, there’s no other way.

Link: Falcon Motorcycles

Kestrel Falcon rear view
Kestrel Falcon rear view

Posted on May 11, 2010 Filed Under: Custom motorcycles, Motorcycle Builders, Vintage Motorcycles


-- Subscribe to The Kneeslider --

Be the first to know when something’s new!


Be sure to check out The Kneeslider’s motorcycle models listings.

Your purchases through ebay links on The Kneeslider may earn a commission for this site.




« IIHS Pushing for Motorcycle Anti Lock Brakes
Hammarhead Volta 102 – Electric Royal Enfield »

Comments

  1. Davidw says

    May 11, 2010 at 10:39 am

    is an aluminum jug a good idea on a solid lifter motor.?….iron expands less. the bike is gorgeous.

  2. WillyP says

    May 11, 2010 at 10:58 am

    Given the limited amount of mileage this bike would likely rack up I wouldn’t see an issue, just means more valve clearance when cold.

  3. pabsyboots says

    May 11, 2010 at 11:11 am

    stunning
    with such talent why expend it on a one off ?, 2,000 hours can never be recouped in the retail price
    why not use this talent in an area where more people can benefit and is more profitable

    its fantastic that such work can be undertaken and i’m not saying its a bad thing at all im curious as to the motivation however and even the economics that allow the luxury of such a build

  4. Walt says

    May 11, 2010 at 11:14 am

    I’ve long thought these tidy Triumph hardtail bobbers are among the most attractive customs around. This is one of the best: beautifully styled and finished. But where’s the innovation?

  5. Tin Man 2 says

    May 11, 2010 at 11:17 am

    Hard to listen to talk of function with a Ridgid frame and no Front fender… However this is a beautyfull piece of work and built to a very high level, the cylinders alone are gorgeous. The long and low style appears to be the new chopper.

  6. FREEMAN says

    May 11, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    Beautiful build. I wouldn’t care what others call it. Art or “real” motorcycle? To the builder and motorcyclist: no explanation is necessary. To the critic: no answer would be enough.

  7. kneeslider says

    May 11, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    @Walt: “where’s the innovation?”

    It might be in their efforts to peg the build quality meter more than once.

  8. todd says

    May 11, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    Great work, no doubt. I wonder what sort of personal life this person has to be able to spend that much time on this – unless this is his job.

    The A-10 BSA transmission is a nice touch as it allows a number of different ratios and clutches for racing (Gold Star). This thing should be competitive now that the standard Trump tranny is no longer holding it back…

    -todd

  9. Steve says

    May 11, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    This is a labour of love. I suspect the 2000 hours that were spent on it were pure enoyment. The level of detail is from another era. Personally I am glad that there are still people that are willing to do this. Besides, its better than building something like a ship in a bottle, or some other hobby that eats up the hours!

  10. krazy kym says

    May 11, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    I know what you mean pabsyboots, I don’t know how they make it worth their time making 1 bike a year! STill, I loved the Bullet, it was my favorite bike till now, so I’m SO GLAD that Mr. Barry does decide to make these bikes – I’ll take 1 per year better than none! The Kestrel looks like a total stunner, really, I cannot wait to see it with my own eyes…if I’m ever lucky enough that is! There’s a good story behind the unveiling of the Kestrel at this site – lot of good pics too…

    http://lostinasupermarket.com/2010/05/falcon-kestrel-motorcycle-finally-unveiled/

  11. Marvin says

    May 11, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    Average television viewing hours in the UK and US are 28 per person per week. This means in 72 weeks of no TV you have got those 2000 hours in just 4 hours per day. How many compliments have you ever had about how much better you have got with the remote? How many compliments will these guys get, I hope it’s an awful lot because that is some very nice work.

  12. Tim says

    May 11, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    This is cool.

  13. steve w says

    May 11, 2010 at 9:38 pm

    Way to sum it up Marvin. I watch little tv but spend a lot of time on projects. Now that I have retired I have spent many 80 hours weeks in the shop and then again some weeks where I am seldom in there. It’s about you passion.

  14. '37 Indian says

    May 12, 2010 at 12:44 am

    From 30 feet away this looks like a drag bike made up from a bunch of old pre-unit Triumph parts, and I have a feeling that’s the impression the builder was going for. Actually, you COULD build one similar to this from old Triumph parts. However, the closer you look you begin to see that’s not exactly what you have here. It’s a mixture of old production and newly made parts, the new pieces being jewel-like in quality. It’s interesting how the machinist tried to make the parts LOOK like old Triumph parts. One would like to look at this bike very closely, to see the work that went into it. I wouldn’t say that the overall style of this bike is anything particularly new, but it’s nice to see something that’s not a copycat of so many current customs with big inch S&S motors on them. Cool.

  15. Cameron Nicol says

    May 12, 2010 at 3:07 am

    I’m glad to see true craftmanship is not dead even while using a 5 axis milling machine. This is what should be done with dead bikes: resurrect them. Leave the old “Norton in a crate” in the crate, buy a junker and give it life.

  16. Andrew says

    May 12, 2010 at 3:31 am

    A fantastic piece of work (or art) but not really my cup of tea. Prefer riding to cleaning…

  17. Scotduke says

    May 12, 2010 at 4:37 am

    It’s very pretty and beautifully made. It’s certainly not a daily rider. I remember the drums on my T100 weren’t bad for drums and a huge step up from the brakes on the Tigercub I’d had earlier but fitting even the best drums these days is form over function. Ok for a hardtail I suppose, you’re own rear end would be complaining after a few miles on that seat anyway.

  18. Sportster Mike says

    May 12, 2010 at 5:39 am

    Yes, very nice bike. Won’t be able to see it in the flesh as I live in England
    Love the new barrels – hopefully won’t be leaking like my old T140V
    Seriously though.. 2000 hours work and it’s a labour of love and if he wanted to build 10, 20 or a 100 a year the quality would go downhill and compromises would have to be made.
    And I love the fact that no old bike has died to build this one but rather that part of a wreck that no one looked at twice has been re-born
    And isn’t aircraft alloy east to keep clean?

    Ride safe guys

  19. Phoebe says

    May 12, 2010 at 12:16 pm

    I knew this would pop up on the The Kneeslider.

    It’s an incredibly beautiful bike with painstaking attention to detail and amazing craftsmanship. And yes, it does look like an old drag bike.

    However, I have to say…is anyone else sick of this trend of hardtails? I like my bikes to have actual suspensions, thanks. That’s my only real criticism.

  20. rafe03 says

    May 12, 2010 at 12:17 pm

    I don’t know if I’d wipe it down or lick it clean it’s nice enough to eat!! What a great job of rescueing a classic!!

    Regarding drum brakes, I had an Atlas once. Went racing. Brakes were the s**ts. On knowlegeable advise, I carefully mounted the front brakes from a Honda CB72 into the 8″ Norton drum. AM4 linings, a good set-up (trued on a lathe), an air scoop, very careful cable adjustment & I could out-brake the CB750 Honda’s in my class. Goes to show how expert advise & help from experienced old timers boosted a newby’s progress. (Of course, it didn’t help improve my miniscule quotum of riding skill or make up for the lack of HP vs the CB’s)

  21. TMarkus says

    May 12, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    Truly a spectacular piece of craftsmanship. Out of Ian and Amaryllis’ relentless pursuit of style, quality and perfection has come one of the most iconic motorcycles of our time. It is a pleasure to work with a small group of highly talented craftsmen dedicated to excellence…Thanks.

  22. powermatic says

    May 12, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    @Phoebe-

    My thoughts exactly re. the hardtail aspect of the bike-this much work and no rear suspension? At any rate, incredible workmanship and I am even more enthusiastic about the builder’s commitment to keep intact bikes intact. Well done.

  23. OMMAG says

    May 12, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    WOW!

  24. todd says

    May 12, 2010 at 10:35 pm

    I keep old pieces of junk on the road too.

    -todd

  25. Emmet says

    May 13, 2010 at 12:04 am

    I like the recreation of the motorcycle from his perspective. It does resemble a Brough Superior as mentioned, with almost everything polished and worked over by hand. I have a deep respect for Ian but I disagree with the complete level of cleanliness, such as polished drum brake linkage arms and the foot controls which will end up scuffed. It seems that the detail work proposes it as a static artwork, and not a motorcycle that will be ridden. If that is the case, it says that Ian’s idea of the motorcycle is something meant to be looked at and ridden around on the fair grounds, but never to see the open road. Then this would be the antithesis of motorcycling.

  26. Thom says

    May 13, 2010 at 1:46 am

    The reason for building a hardtail is to increase your connection to the machine, and the road. You become very aware of your surroundings when every pothole puts a jolt directly to your spine. I respect the desire for suspension, but it IS the choice of the builder to do what THEY want. That said, this machine is utterly stunning. A piece of art you can ride.

  27. JGJs says

    May 13, 2010 at 2:21 am

    does that mean that you disagree with harley, bmw, roland sands, triumph, norton, dodge, big dog, lexus, confederate, west coast choppers, ford, shinya kimura, mercedes and all other motorcycle and car brands and their designers for making shiny polished motorcycles and cars that look clean on tehir websites, because it mean they propose their vehicles as static works meant to be looked at and ridden around on fairgrounds only? if you stop to think about it, it’s not weird that the photos were taken when the bike was new. it’s kooky to assume that because it’s metal that will get skuffed instead of sleeved plastic or rubber it makes this bike the antithesis of motorcycling though. it’s like any new thing you almost got to skuff it up when you get it so you don’t have to ride around being all paranoid

  28. NextVoiceUHear says

    May 13, 2010 at 9:48 am

    My back-handed compliment is that the engine is NOT an S&S V-Twin. I’d like to see a video of the CNC mill carving out those jugs. Definitely adults-only viewing….
    NVUH

  29. joe says

    May 13, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    Great engineering, would like one to display in my lounge room.

  30. Ed Lane says

    May 13, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    Haha Joe, you might find he’s the real deal not made for hire.

  31. Aerion says

    May 15, 2010 at 11:50 am

    Although I greatly admire the skill and effort invested, the choice of 7075 aluminum alloy for the cylinders is not the greatest. 7075 is a high strength alloy but it suffers from stress-corrosion cracking problems and has among the worst ratings for such failure modes. In aircraft design it is typically used for structurally elements that are loaded in compression only so that the applied loads tend to close any cracks that may appear during the life of the aircraft. Justifying its use under more complex loadings is a costly exercise in analysis and full scale testing. The 7075-T73 temper does have better resistance to stress-corrosion cracking, but the heat of combustion will eliminate the original temper within a few rides.

    Much of the after-market industry has latched on to the high strength properties of 7000-series aluminum alloys, but I am unconvinced that much thought is given to material stiffness, fatigue resistance, damage tolerance, and corrosion resistance and their resulting influence on the part’s reliability and longevity.

    Keep an eye on those cylinders.

  32. MAP aluminum says

    May 15, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    MAP and others have spent 15 years and huge investment developing and testing aluminum CNC produced cylinders. 6061 and 7000 series has been used for cylinders for over a decade with no big issues as of yet. “Alloy billet extrusion is similar to a forging because is compressed and formed under extreme pressure for correct grain alignment and considerable increase in strength over normal billet extrusions and especially when compared to 356 castings,” like the regular triumph cylinders. I’ve been running a Bonneville with 7000 series billet cylinders for almost five years, riding relitively hard about 3-4 times a week. So far, they’ve run great. I’m going to have to have them re-sleeved soon that’s the only thing i’d critisize, from research I’ve done nikasil would be the way to go, aluminum butting up against aluminum, instead of iron sleeves. The Falcon cylinder looks beautiful, I can’t imagine the bikes going to be run anywhere close to hard enough that the cylinders could be a problem. MAPs been running theirs in bikes for years.

  33. Aerion says

    May 15, 2010 at 11:13 pm

    I can understand the use of 6061 as it has good strength, stiffness, and better resistance to fatigue and corrosion. Those are among the reasons it is so widely used for so many applications. I am curious as to the reasons for going to the greater expense of a 7000-series alloy. Are the cylinder wall thickness and cooling fin pitch decreased? Do the 7000-series cylinders use slightly less material, enough to offset the slightly greater density relative to 6000-series and give a lighter cylinder?

  34. Brenda Fox says

    May 16, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    STUNNING! Wonderful example of Ian’s passion, talent and pursuit of excellence along with Amaryllis first class vision of delivering nothing less than Excellent!
    El Mirage baby! See ya there!

  35. Obi-dan says

    May 17, 2010 at 12:53 am

    Ok, you guys, there seems to be a bit of confusion here concerning metals. Originally, Team Falcon had thought of using 7075 for its strength but figured the added expense and physical properties were not the best for this situation. This notion seems to have trickled down the media slide as truth. The cylinders are, in fact, 6061 T-651 extruded Aluminum. With the grain going side to side. Don’t worry, everything is fine.

  36. MCSpares says

    May 22, 2010 at 4:39 am

    A fine looking bike. I don’t like things being over restored, as in polished were they were not polished or chromed where they were not chromed. But this is not a restoration, it’s a creation….and a fine job… done well with the end product in view every inch of the way. Or so it looks now. Alloy barrels were used on Tiger 100’s with no troubles. The amount of miles this beast will do it will be just fine. Some people try too hard to find problems. If it was being raced on the Isle of Man it might be a problem.

Subscribe to The Kneeslider

Be the first to know when something's new!

Search articles on The Kneeslider


Do You need motorcycle parts?

Everything from normal maintenance items to hard to find out of production parts, look here first.
Be very specific for best results! Use part numbers if you have them.


Be sure to check out The Kneeslider’s new motorcycle manuals and literature listings.



Your purchases through ebay links on The Kneeslider may earn a commission for this site.



From The Kneeslider Archives

Harley 4 valve big twin sport bike

Harley Davidson 4 Valve Big Twin Sportbike

ACE Fireball 535 Royal Enfield high performance engine kit

ACE Fireball 535 Royal Enfield High Performance Kit

RSS What’s happening on HorsePowerSports

  • DeLorean Motor Company is Coming Back with an Electric
  • Ford Shares Open Source CAD Files for 3D Printing Truck Accessories
  • If You Need a New Car, Buy an Old One Instead

Motorcycle Engine Powered Cars

Copyright © 2025 · The Kneeslider · Website by Crowe Computer Services
US Army veteran owned and operated
This website proudly Made in the USA!
Made in the USA