• Articles
  • Motorcycles for Sale
  • Motorcycle Parts
  • Motorcycle Manuals
  • Models
  • Collectibles
  • Contact

The Kneeslider

Doers Builders and Positive People

Cosentino Engineering 600cc V4 Moto2 Project Made in the USA

By Paul Crowe

Cosentino V4 Moto2 project design
Cosentino V4 Moto2 project design

The previous post about the Moto2 suspension project brought a link in the comments leading to Cosentino Engineering, where Chris Consentino is building a Moto2 bike based around a 600cc V4 engine, built from scratch, along with a new frame, girder front suspension, swingarm and everything else. Of course, there’s a problem, Moto2 rule makers decided to go with a single spec engine provided by Honda, great for Honda, not so great for the innovation you might have if the rules allowed competing engines. Chris decided to go ahead with the project anyway and what he has accomplished already is really some beautiful work. Looks like it will be a road bike instead of a racer, unless the Moto2 folks decide to let innovation back into the race. (Anyone know if this may change?)

Cosentino V4 Moto2 project design
Cosentino V4 Moto2 project design

Chris has an extensive progress report with photos on his blog, detailing the design of the bike and engine, the initial casting and machining, the various parts and pieces he’ll be using, it’s great to see someone moving ahead like this. He’s assembled a team of people including Kolb Machine Inc., Crye Associates, TPI Arcade/Harmony Castings and Celtic Racing to make this entire project come together. You’ll also notice in one photo below the books on his shelf, John Britten, Tony Foale, all the usual suspects.

Cosentino V4 Moto2 engine
Cosentino V4 Moto2 engine

A made in the USA V4 powered motorcycle, with everything built from scratch, hmm,… that’s getting to be a trend, and I like it, a lot!

Thanks, Doug, for pointing out this link which I didn’t notice and thanks to John B. for putting that link in there in the first place. It just shows there’s a lot of great work going on out there under the radar which needs more attention brought to it. I hope this helps.

Link: Cosentino Engineering
Link: Chris’ Moto2 project blog

More photos below:

Cosentino V4 Moto2 chassis castings
Cosentino V4 Moto2 chassis castings
Cosentino V4 Moto2 crankshafts after initial machining
Cosentino V4 Moto2 crankshafts after initial machining

Posted on January 12, 2011 Filed Under: Motorcycle Builders, Motorcycle Design, Motorcycle Racing


-- Subscribe to The Kneeslider --

Be the first to know when something’s new!


Be sure to check out The Kneeslider’s motorcycle models listings.

Your purchases through ebay links on The Kneeslider may earn a commission for this site.




« Hub Center Steering Moto2 Project LaMoto2 – Submit Your Design
Von Dutch Moto Guzzi Falcone Custom »

Comments

  1. hoyt says

    January 12, 2011 at 11:11 am

    Best of luck, this is fantastic. A ground-up bike with their own engine & front-end.

    The determination is great…read one of his 1st blog entries. It debunks the claims about the cost to race in prototype racing.

  2. Paul Crowe - "The Kneeslider" says

    January 12, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    It wasn’t so long ago that projects of this caliber were not feasible to anyone without factory backing or very deep pockets. Now it’s a matter of motivation, creativity and skill, you know, the thing we talk about with “doers.” I love this stuff.

    • Jar says

      January 13, 2011 at 4:08 pm

      Are you kidding? This is a massive effort, not unlike a lot of factory efforts.

      7 years of time in development, a pile of significantly complex castings, and some amazing machine work?

      In sand, or in v-process, cored or not cored geometry, those castings are spendy as are the patterns and coreboxes that made them, plus the time and effort to machine them – let alone develop the design, fit, and function even if it were only left to CAD.

      It is not “now a matter of motivation”, a project of this complexity required motivation and commitment from the beginning which I applaud. To continue through to running, workable p-types is extraordinary.

      Projects of this caliber are not feasible to anyone – they are feasible only to those with the commitment, the means (in time, $$$, and talent), and the desire. This cat obviously has all.

      Go man go! Is all I can say, and I am truly amazed!!

  3. BoxerFanatic says

    January 12, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    Very interesting.

    The upper control arm is pretty high up, but it makes an interesting solution to the steering linkage, to go right along side the upper control arm, and not need a collapsing joint steering link.

  4. rohorn says

    January 12, 2011 at 1:46 pm

    PLEASE point this one out next time someone posts something negative about CAD concept rendering – they DO result in real motorcycles sometimes!

    Projects like this are inspiring – I’d rather read about this than another craigslist cliche’ custom.

  5. russel caudell says

    January 12, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    I’m being picky, but that’s not a girder suspension, but looks like a design based on the Hossack suspension. But I love it.

    • Paul Crowe - "The Kneeslider" says

      January 12, 2011 at 6:07 pm

      Looks like you’re right. My girder/Hossack identification skills seem to be a bit off.

  6. Fred M.l says

    January 12, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    Standardizing on a Honda engine was a terrible mistake; it completely screwed over the factories, other than Honda, that competed in GP250 (the class that Moto 2 replaced).

    Don’t get me wrong: A spec engine is a good thing, but it should not have been a branded product from a motorcycle manufacturer. What possible value is there for Yamaha, Aprilia, Kawasaki, or Gilera to sponsor teams that would be winning races with Honda engines? And without that factory participation, there is no longer a way for any factory but Honda to field riders in the Moto2 class while grooming them to move up to the MotoGP class.

    • Ken says

      January 12, 2011 at 6:13 pm

      I’m not a race fan so I have no clue…. But if it is a spec engine, why can’t the GP series allow each manufacturer to basically manufacture the same engine? Request Honda to license its design to the other manufacturers so they could have the internals the same, thereby having a level playing field where the emphasis is on the chasis and riding ability…

    • Mule says

      January 13, 2011 at 7:11 am

      With the high costs of racing involved at every level, especially MotoGP, the fact the other manufacturers don’t have to or get to field bikes in Moto2, is probably a blessing.

      Race teams are cutting back or disappearing altogether in the US and everywhere else I would assume, so I think if they (companies) were fielding Moto2 teams as well, racing would suffer around the world even more.

  7. DS says

    January 12, 2011 at 3:12 pm

    We are at an extraordinary time in history. Electric power & continued advancements in i-c power will be battling soon enough. Why would a single engine platform from a single, huge manufacturer be used at this point in history?

    A spec engine class that travels the globe in support of a full prototype class is contradictory & stifling.

    At first I was immediately bored at the sound of this spec engine class. Then I thought it could spark chassis development, particularly front-ends. Now, after seeing the effort put forth by these guys, they should be grand-fathered into the class for the sake of continued improvement & innovation. No question. Everything according to Honda (or insert any other lone OEM) does not work for anyone except the single entity.

    • tim says

      January 12, 2011 at 4:08 pm

      Given the clout that Honda has, that will never happen.

      • DS says

        January 12, 2011 at 5:26 pm

        there are plenty of race fans with a voice that ride something other than Honda

  8. RSVDan says

    January 12, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    Last I heard, starting in 2012, Moto2 would be dropping the CBR based spec engines and going to something more in line with MotoGP and Moto3. Expect to see 500cc motors with a bore restriction of 81mm that is shared with the 1000cc GP bikes, and the 250cc Moto3 bikes.

    • Leo says

      January 13, 2011 at 3:13 pm

      Where did you hear that RSVDan??? it makes perfect sense to me

  9. Mark says

    January 12, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    This is simply awesome! It is basically a Hossack/Fior front end with a little twist. There is actually a steering head and stem suspended from the wishbones that the upright bolts to. The steering upright rotates around the fixed steering stem. This would reduce the steering stiction of the Hossack rod end type joints since the upright would rotate in conventional steering head bearings, the trade off is increased unsprung weight though.

    The engine reminds me a 4 cylinder version of the VR1000, very cool! I prefer this engine over the Motus V4, since it can bu used in a wide range of different applications.
    Awesome!

  10. Mark says

    January 12, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    I’m not quit sure of the 600cc Moto2 route. This bike will never be allowed to run in Moto2,
    but could be eligible for MotoGP if it was 800cc, or possibly 1000cc if it’s eventually considered a claiming rule spec engine for 2012. Buy the looks of things, it seems they have enough room to increase displacement though.

  11. Will13 says

    January 12, 2011 at 4:08 pm

    I haven’t heard about the mentioned rule change in Moto 2 to allow more of a variety of engine suppliers into the class in 2012. If they do open the series up, it’s a double edge sword. The reason for the spec engine in the first place was to aid in keeping costs down, something that has apparently worked as many teams are running in the series. That said, Moto 2 does lose a bit of its flavor by being a Honda-only powered series. The racing is good and tight for the most part, but many racing series are trying to battle a struggling global economy by cutting costs while still retaining ticket sales.

    Nonetheless, I really like what Cosentino has come up with here. A revolutionary sport motorcycle that’s built in America. We have a lot of talent in this country, and I really hope Chris’s bike makes it to market on a global level to showcase his abilities.

  12. Mark says

    January 12, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    I never inferred that Moto2 was changing their formula, that’s why I’m questioning his choice of a 600cc displacement.

  13. rich says

    January 12, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    It’s actually a Hossack front supension which is not a girder. With a girder the suspension links are steered along with the rest of the suspension components. A Hossack has the steering pivots at the ends of the links/arms.

  14. Chris Cosentino says

    January 12, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    Thanks for all the positive comments on the project. 600cc was chosen because for a period of about 3 months the FIM had released initial Moto2 rules stating that Moto2 was to be open engine with rpm limits, spec ECU, and engine claiming. In that period I started this project and was dismayed when the spec engine was instituted. I did try to get a grid position and would have built a bike around a CBR engine, however boring that is, but we did not get a spot. That kept me free to build what I consider to be an exciting motorcycle, unfortunately on a sort of open ended time frame.

    As far as being a real GP class, Moto2 is anything but. The chassis makers in it are doing a great job and I would like to be there too but in the end the class is really just a contest to see who can make the 2nd best CBR600RR.

    Keep in mind that this is not a one-off bike project. I’ve been developing the chassis and suspension for about 7 years using a series of increasingly refined single cylinder bikes and have the technology working very well. Hopefully this V4 bike will allow me to realize all of the suspension and chassis knowledge I’ve gained but with power that a single couldn’t provide.

    • Emmet says

      January 12, 2011 at 7:10 pm

      Chris, I’ve been following your blog since I came across it months ago. Excellent work! This is avant garde engineering, so much unique work going on here. Looking forward to more progress. I’m undergoing a 20 week engineering project focused on alternative front motorcycle suspension and yours is quite intriguing.

    • DS says

      January 13, 2011 at 12:37 am

      Chris –
      You are executing on many areas:

      lightweight
      smaller displacement
      a front-end built in concert with its engine/chassis
      American performance bike (huge market for this domestically & internationally)

      go for it!

    • Paulinator says

      January 15, 2011 at 12:30 pm

      Amazing! The kind of work you are doing must make the big players ask a lot of hard questions of thier product development / engineering groups during budget reviews.

      I have to ask a question. (I have a tilt-smelter and I’m pretty well versed with pattern-making and various casting processes.) Why all the sharp corners on the engine castings?

  15. Tom says

    January 12, 2011 at 10:51 pm

    I’m liking this new round of American engineering that I read about on this blog. However, the only issue of complaint that I have would have to be the names. From this to Motus, none of the names sounds “cool” or endearing. I just don’t see people getting tattoos of these names. Maybe its just me…..

    • Chris Cosentino says

      January 13, 2011 at 5:47 pm

      Tom, In the early days a ‘Ducati’ was a radio part and a ‘Harley’ was a motor powered bicycle. I think that any of those marques we associate with tattoo-level devotion has had to earn it. I look forward to trying to earn that level of distinction in the coming years.

  16. Bob says

    January 13, 2011 at 12:17 am

    Cool. I’d heard of Chris from his participation in the Team Incomplete BMW. From the Team Incomplete website, I’d heard about his Rotacular project. Way to take it to the next level with this Moto2 project!

  17. Malove says

    January 13, 2011 at 6:27 am

    Only one phrase needed here ”good luck guys”

    By the way yeah Tom You are not alone :p

  18. Mark L says

    January 13, 2011 at 11:10 pm

    At risk of being banned from Kneesliders, and completely tongue in cheek,

    might I put forth the name “Cosenart motorcycles”……….

    Processes the competition into little chunks of moto matter….!

    Mark L.

  19. Hugo says

    January 14, 2011 at 3:27 am

    Well the first Moto2 bike with a FFE (funny front end) has seen the daylight; made by the same company who builts the Vyrus:
    http://www.motoblog.it/post/27760/motor-bike-expo-2011-ecco-la-vyrus-986-m2

  20. Sick Cylinder says

    January 14, 2011 at 4:26 am

    Excellent project and very interesting.

    Re Moto2 – The new Moto3 rules (replacement for the 125cc class) are more open than the current Moto2 rules featuring more electronics and engine choice. I am certain that Moto2 will change when the current contract runs out.

    It was very amateurish to release rules and then change them – other projects were affected for instance Harris went for a Yamaha powered bike and had spent a lot of time and money before the decision to go with a Honda spec engine – they are now being very cautious about Moto3.

    The new Moto2 class has been a success with 40 bikes on the grid (more than double MotoGP) and close racing – the top 20 riders qualify within a second of each other.

    The organisers didn’t want factory teams in Moto2 – the idea is to have a level playing field so that the talent shines through. The rules have given satellite MotoGP teams the opportunity to field junior teams of riders and use the engineering skills within the team, which they have not been able to use in the premier class e.g. Tech 3 / Guy Coulon.

  21. tim says

    January 14, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    600cc V4 with EFI, light and nimble, sportbike or naked sports (like a Triumph Street Triple). A latter day VFR400 NC30 or NC35? Sign me up!

  22. JR says

    January 15, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    Very very cool. Exactly what some of us were talking about with the Motus, need to make a smaller displacement V4 in a sportbike… the trick front suspension is just icing.

    VERY COOL!

  23. Fabio says

    January 15, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    Honda? No, Moto 2 free engines!!!!

  24. donald branscom says

    May 26, 2011 at 11:51 pm

    Why is the rear swing arm so large?
    Looks awful.
    The rest of it looks reasonable.

  25. rohorn says

    August 18, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    There’s an excellent multi-page article on this in Roadracing World, Sept. 2011 issue.

Subscribe to The Kneeslider

Be the first to know when something's new!

Search articles on The Kneeslider


Do You need motorcycle parts?

Everything from normal maintenance items to hard to find out of production parts, look here first.
Be very specific for best results! Use part numbers if you have them.


Be sure to check out The Kneeslider’s new motorcycle collectibles listings.



Your purchases through ebay links on The Kneeslider may earn a commission for this site.



From The Kneeslider Archives

CR700P twin rotor racer from Crighton Racing

CR700P 700cc Rotary Racer From Crighton Racing

Ace Cycle Car

Ace Cycle Car Update

RSS What’s happening on HorsePowerSports

  • DeLorean Motor Company is Coming Back with an Electric
  • Ford Shares Open Source CAD Files for 3D Printing Truck Accessories
  • If You Need a New Car, Buy an Old One Instead

Motorcycle Engine Powered Cars

Copyright © 2025 · The Kneeslider · Website by Crowe Computer Services
US Army veteran owned and operated
This website proudly Made in the USA!
Made in the USA