Previous: Harley Davidson Sportster Off Road Conversions
Next: Moto Guzzi V7 Sport from Combined Design Studio


Triumph Millenium 900 by Vicente Design

by Paul Crowe - "The Kneeslider" on 10/13/2009

in Custom motorcycles, Motorcycle Design, Vintage Motorcycles

Triumph Millenium 900 by Vicente Design

Triumph Millenium 900 by Vicente Design - The Triumph Hurricane brought up to date

Triumph Millenium 900 by Vicente DesignMost of you are familiar with the Triumph Hurricane X75 designed by Craig Vetter. It's a classic with 3 upswept pipes and red orange bodywork. Jean François Vicente, who we saw before when we highlighted some of his classic cafe work, did a custom he calls the Millenium 900. A customer wanted him to build a modern version of the Hurricane using a Triumph 900 Adventurer as the starting point and what you see is the result, a beautiful recreation of the Craig Vetter design, updated with modern hardware and technology.

The composite body looks very much like the original, he made custom stainless pipes in the original style, the forks are from a Honda Valkyrie, the headlight from a Yamaha Fazer 600, Yamaha MT01 handlebars and custom aluminum housings for the stock gauges top it off. The whole project is really well done.

Jean has moved to a new website and now works designing a wide range of projects for his clients. He sent me a note a few weeks ago to let me know he has a lot more more photos of his work online and while looking through them this one really jumped out. I noticed, too, that Luca Bar pointed to his Sportster Scrambler in a comment on a recent post, it's another nice bit of work.

Jean's site is definitely worth checking out, his Sportster cafe in the Egli Vincent style is another beauty and breaks away from the more common Sportster customs. I could link to many more of his bikes, but it's probably easier if you look over the site on your own. I think you'll like what you see.

Link: Vicente Design

Triumph Hurricane X75 - an original for comparison

Triumph Hurricane X75 - an original for comparison

Share

{ 24 comments… add yours below ... }

Walt 10.13.09 at 10:10 am

A fine looking custom. I especially like the way he minimized the radiator but didn’t try to entirely obscure it. Triumph itself won’t make one of these, which is good: too many running around would make this less special.

Tin Man 2 10.13.09 at 10:27 am

This mans talent is inspiring, His web site has more beauty then any I have seen. All his builds could be Manufactured by the respective Bike Companys, He puts the Co. designers to shame. This kind of reminds me of the young designer of the “new” Pontiac GTO, He boasted that he never even rode in an old Goat. You must remember the poor job he did in his attempt to reinvent the GTO. The corporate designers are so intent on breaking new ground, When an update of a classic is often so much better.

Ian 10.13.09 at 10:58 am

Couldn’t disgaree more. The body looks bloated and the visual weight & proportion isn’t a patch on the X75. Looks like something I’d expect from a Chinese ‘copy’ of a Hurricane.

The KR500 on the other hand…

Tanshanomi 10.13.09 at 11:51 am

I’m with Ian on this one. The original Hurricane bodywork was lithe, sensual, minimalistic; everything this isn’t.

Phoebe 10.13.09 at 12:25 pm

Huh, I’m surprised at the reactions to this bike. I think it’s very well done. I recognized what it was immediately.

Sid 10.13.09 at 12:40 pm

This is a nice build, but the bodywork of the original is just as important as the 3 exhausts. Not all may realize how much impact the minimal bodywork impacts the overall aesthetic of the original. There’s quite a difference between the 2 above

Puzzled by the lack of a round headlight.

kneeslider 10.13.09 at 1:06 pm

For those who think this is somehow “bloated” or not sufficiently trim, you need to remember he was not building a replica, he was adapting a customer’s Triumph Adventurer to have the appearance of the original Hurricane. The 900 triple is liquid cooled, larger than the original and he had to make the radiator look as small as possible. There were hoses and wires to be hidden and compared to the starting point, what he did was amazing, check out an Adventurer and make the comparison yourself. Simply copying an original would not have required the creative skill he shows with this work.

Viv Collins 10.13.09 at 2:01 pm

Taking the comments in to account I still think the updated interpretation looks better than the original to my eye, yes I see the slimness of the flanks around the seat/tank transition as a design goal but I also see nasty turn of the century slidemaster type narrow tires that make the original look slimmer compared to the newer bike

JustPete 10.13.09 at 2:23 pm

To get this from the original Adventurer is pretty friggen sweet. I dont know if I’d add a little more rear end to this design but I like it. I cant see side veiw on the link at work. I sure wouldnt kick this out of my garage. Really like the blacked out motor and the front end.

John 10.13.09 at 2:24 pm

I think this bike looks great,to the detractors,like Paul said it’s watercooled and the motor is phyisically larger,aside from that it just looks good.

Crash Swearnagin 10.13.09 at 3:05 pm

I dig it, flat track bars,upswept hurricane pipes, plenty of ground clearance and a 900cc triple makes for a rowdy good time on the street.

David 10.13.09 at 4:11 pm

Your crazy if you think they wouldn’t sell a zillion of these in the US. A bike like this would make Triumph a force here like it was in the 60’s. Too bad this guy doesn’t work for them.

todd 10.13.09 at 4:24 pm

Not my cup of tea, but it is very well done. David is right that Triumph could do very well selling these. They already have a steady corner on the nostalgia market.

-todd

kim 10.13.09 at 4:29 pm

Looking back and forth on the original Hurricane and the newest interpretation, the newbie gets a thumbs down, mainly because of the awful side panels. I’ve seen Vincente’s impressive bikes before, and measure the new ‘Urricane against those too, and again it falls short. As for it selling, no way. The original Hurricane didn’t sell particularly well either.

Secaman 10.13.09 at 4:30 pm

now were talking….blow up the Harley cafe stuff posted earlier and let me gaze on this beauty. Yaow.

Sid 10.13.09 at 4:47 pm

No, Blow up every Seca. The Egli Vincent cafe Sportster is his best work in my opinion.

Extra effort put into the lower side panels would have further set off the new Hurricane.

David 10.13.09 at 4:54 pm

the original didn’t sell well because by the time it was released everyone knew about the problems with the engine and just like today there was no shortage of people ready to dislike something different. Park an original anywhere now and the crowd will show it wasn’t to bad of a design.

Kenneth Warner 10.13.09 at 4:55 pm

Any design, whether totally original, or based on existing components will require compromises along the way. The compromises required on this project have not detracted from the originall goal. I believe this to be a tribute to Craig Vetter’s original, and well executed beyond what anyone could expect. Congrats!

kim 10.13.09 at 7:27 pm

The original was indeed a beautiful looking bike, and despite the slightly longer front forks upsetting its handling, it was well recieved. Sadly that didn’t translate into sales figures, as so often is the case. The Philippe Starck designed Aprilia 6.5 single was a more recent example of the same problem. Unlike the Hurricane it was not a modified stock bike, but designed so from the ground up. It looked great and stands as one of the preciously few examples of where a designer from outside the bike business knows what he’s doing. Still the conventional version outsold it 10 to 1.

Marneyman 10.13.09 at 9:56 pm

The bikes are gorgeous, the mods subtle and refined, the translation miserable. My god couldn’t he have found an EFL buddy to proof read that?

marvin 10.14.09 at 5:26 am

I really like the look of the bike and the second picture shows it does get narrow where your hips are allowing you to shift your body easily. Maybe it is because I’m English and only think of the original as the US version which all tend to get tarred with the “like our version but heavier and doesn’t handle” brush. Really looking at the original now I can’t understand my old prejudices and the Vicente work on this new bike is just great. The bike though made by a French man seems to smack me with a sort of combined Anglo American nostalgia while still looking like a really useful tool for the real modern world. I doff my hat to the creator.

Fraser 10.14.09 at 11:11 am

As the owner of a Legend TT, I have only one word – STUNNING.
Where do I sign?

Nicolas 10.14.09 at 1:30 pm

Never been a fan of the Hurricane, but always thought it has a little “je ne sais quoi”. Now, this interpretation based on the modern liquid cooled triple is beautiful, that’s a stunning bike. Love it.

Nicolas

todd 10.14.09 at 3:15 pm

I personally think the new interpretation flows better than the original. I was never comfortable with the joint between the tank and the side panel and its abrupt change of direction occurring right at the pet-cock or Vetter’s treatment of the side covers which have absolutely no relationship to the exposed frame member. Then there was the way Mr. Vetter left the seat pan to angle out in a different direction than the seat frame, entirely visible below it. No, Vincente’s version has much better lines. Craig Vetter is a talented man, don’t get me wrong…

-todd

So, ... what do YOU think?

The Kneeslider does not endorse nor imply agreement with any particular comment just because we let it stand, but, you already knew that.

Comments should be closely related to post content. Personal attacks, personal grievances and profanity will be removed. Please read the entire post and check for included links before commenting or asking questions. We're looking for your interesting thoughts and ideas that add to the conversation. Thank you.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

The reCaptcha form below has become necessary to reduce spam comments. If you can't read the words, please use the reload button (the 2 curved arrows just above the speaker symbol) for a new challenge. Thanks for your help! - "The Kneeslider"