This is what the designer, Branko Lukic, calls the nUCLEUS, an alternative fuel motorbike concept. He thinks motorcycles shouldn’t mimic one another but instead should do things differently. His nUCLEUS (Why do designers write like they hit the caps lock?) is a “square against the air” which looks like a slab from the side but from the front presents only blades to confront the wind.
The bike squats down resting on the body when parked and rises up when ready to ride. Its appearance isn’t what I would call appealing but it certainly is different and as we look into the future, everything is worth at least some consideration, so here it is.
This is in no way a finished idea but only a concept and it’s sure to evoke an emotional response in some viewers, especially if they’re used to what might be called a “normal” motorcycle. Of course, once you get away from the usual internal combustion engine, the shape and configuration of the motorcycle may vary widely from what we’re used to seeing. Fuel cells, batteries, and who knows what else may not be the best looking technology and covering it up might be the way to go, an idea I’ve mentioned before, plus they may have little need for exposure to the air for cooling like your average engine, either way, things may look a bit different in the future.
Designers like Lukic often push the envelope specifically to get people thinking outside their comfort zone, their ideas may have merit, they may be silly, but at least it gets you thinking.
There’s a video at their site showing more angles and how it rises up and parks. More photos and the link below:
Link: nUCLEUS via Business Week
taxman says
i try and stay open minded about motorcycle design, but i just can’t like this.
it is different…
Chris says
Most motorcyclists — me included — seem to prefer good looks over almost anything else. Even setting that aside, however, and saying I hypothetically valued safety, efficiency, and performance above all else, this strikes me as being nearly impossible to handle in a crosswind and unnecessarily draggy due to all the air being packed into that giant scoop around the front wheel.
It also strikes me as what some of those Bonneville streamliners might have looked like before their streamlining got a little more form-fitting, which is a polite way of saying this is ugly as sin.
Matt in NC says
I see potential ground clearance issues, particularly up front. Imagine those corners digging in when you come into a corner a little hot, under braking. That would be one fun highside.
Ry says
it sure would make a cool kitchen table though.
Nicolas says
besides the emotional reaction and a closed mind not open to future realizations … it’s just a damn cardboard sheet ducttaped on a motorcycle !?
Steven in Halifax says
Ok philp Starks’ bike was ok, but this isn’t sexxy at all…..
Eduardo Di Lascio says
This guy is sooooo arrogant.
chris says
finally…a motorcycle you can put wood panels on. Chicks could wallpaper it with floral designs, or you could put an original mural on it, or put your favorite beer adverisement banner on it.
csmrcka says
I hate to say it, but I actually like it despite it’s functional flaws. It’s so un-what-we-think-when-we-think-motorcycle that it really appeals to me.
Phoebe says
Well…it’s interesting…I guess…
I too would be very concerned about crosswinds. I wonder if it would take off like a kite?
gtada says
Looks like somebody waited until the night before the deadline to design a bike.
I just posted a similar response on the article at BW… but I wanted to throw my two cents down here.
I see that one of the guys who worked on the project has some riding experience, but I highly doubt that he has any experience *designing* a bike. The plates DO look heavy, and even if they are made of a lightweight material, I guarantee that at speed the front of the plates will flap around and shudder.
Aesthetics at the cost of safety IS NOT DESIGN. Design is the process of making things better; remember, form follows function. These guys just stand in a circle jerking themselves off because they think they’ve done something original.
Doing something “original” like this is easy; the question is “can you make it work well?”
kml says
If you could ride inside of it, and where the handle bars are now, if those were gun slots. Now THAT would be cool…
wendell says
Well, he solved the center stand problem quite nicely.
B.Case says
From a design perspective, I will give Lukic credit for attempting to answer questions not many people are asking. To me, his designs take on an almost elementary or child-like approach to a problem. But that’s not a bad thing at all, especially if a majority of the people are not thinking that way. That’s what ART is.
At the very least, the images above may inspire a few designers to ask their own questions, and come up with something that connects with them emotionally. Surely, there’s been better attempts to break the mold in the 2-wheeled world in my opinion.
However, I will say as a response to some of the comments above, it’s not uncommon for somewhat successful industrial designers to feel like they walk on a higher plain. Their language is littered with philosophies and ideals and such, and then they show you a design as a result of all that talk and the majority of “lesser” people don’t “get it”, but they would “get it” if they were as enlightened or had read the books the designer read. Of course, I’m not saying Lukic is like this, I don’t know him, I’m just saying it’s not uncommon in the design industry. But that just makes it much nicer when you do meet some of the few truly humbled designers.
Besides, to me, designs are usually limited, yes limited, by the medium in which they were created, including CAD. Think about it, would the images above evoke the same reaction from people if they were in watercolor?
Ry says
Although I don’t see the practicality in this design , I do appreciate the artistic view of it . Beautiful sculpture indeed , if I had the means it would make a great display piece or modern furniture. I also understand as a designer or artist pieces like this get allot of attention and propel you to fame. I like this design because it provokes curiosity. But I still think it would be a cool flat screen TV table or something.
Jason says
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Right now I’m trying to beholden down my lunch. Bleargh.
todd says
As a designer I understand what the intent was. This bike is not intended to function, come-on, is that a 40″ seat hight? What it does – successfully – is provoke. Not answer, provoke. It allows people to rethink what a motorcycle should or needs to look like considering a change in technology. Even now (starting with the original Gold Wing) bikes still have a “gas tank” in front of the seat even if it’s really located somewhere else.
Let’s give designers credit, (we’re) supposed to think outside the box so that ideas will be fresh 5 years from now when they finally make it to market. Designers need to abandon convention and status quo or companies would fail trying to compete selling the same thing as everyone else. And yes, I do know of a few with their heads in the clouds.
-todd
Freeman says
I agree that this “bike” provokes, but this thing does not inspire me at all.
Reminds me of a cardboard box.
I like to see the true machine behind the bike and fairings, and cardboxes alike, ruin that for me.
Ugly as all get out.
Sean says
It’s bloody ugly. The answer to a question nobody asked, and provoking thoughts nobody wants to think.
B*A*M*F says
As a designer, I agree quite a bit with Todd. This bike is a blank canvas in some ways. It dispenses with the things we identify with as being part of the concept of motorcycle. It has no visible gas tank, it has no visible engine. It has wheels, a seat, controls, and that’s about it. It could be powered by anything.
I personally like the shape, but more as it would relate to a piece of high modern furniture I’d love to see in my home rather than a bike to swing a leg over. It can’t be much more ugly than most contemporary sport bikes look to me. Most of them are insectile and strange with odd shapes and confusing graphics that serve to mask the afore mentioned shapes.
OMMAG says
The FIRST RULE of GOOD design is that FORM follows FUNCTION.
One thing that just galls me is the affectations of so called designers who try to justify a lack of ability by claiming to be doing work for the sake of making people think. This IMO is a prime example of that. As useless as women’s fashions that are unwearable or architecture that can’t or won’t be built.
Motorcycles are ALL about function.
Good form follows efficient and effective function.
This is neither efficient or effective.
Therefore this is a waste of time and Lukic should either do something worthwhile or go work in a fashion house designing crap for artistic interiors or some such.
While it may be true that GREAT designers like Frank Lloyd Wright for example may have pushed the edge of what could be built through innovative design everything they did was based on the concept that form follows function.
Wright would probably have roasted this guy Lukic.
I repeat GOOD design requires that Form Follows Function. Stuff like this is no better than the guys who decorate vehicles to look like appliances or dog houses.
How many ways can I say it …. I am NOT impressed!
GenWaylaid says
I see he started the design with a clean sheet of paper, then said, “Okay, I’m done.”
I love it for being so unashamedly impractical. I can’t wait to pick one up at Ikea.
Bazuzeus says
Is it me or did he just forgot to remove the bike from the box ?
IMHO it’s fugly
lostinoz says
It definitely is something to make you think, and that reminds me I need a new headboard for my bed.
In all reality, clean it up for side wind by taking off all the unneeded extra “fairing areas”, keep the “motor” covered, and what do you end up with? Just another gsxr or ninja with a REALLY ugly headlight and taillight assembly.
The “alternative fuel concept” of this vehicle is lost and overlooked for ugly aesthetics. Also, the fact that the front wheel, rear wheel and seat all “automatically” move and lock into place, it seems that there would be no real room for any power source. I do like the interesting way of securing the bike though, if it cant roll, its harder to steal, if you cant access the front tire, you cant remove it ect. But those of us that are TRUELY interested in alternative vehicles want to see the guts of the bike, or at least know what it is (electric? diesel? e-85?) hp output? approximate run time (in electrics) before recharge or estimated mpg of a fuel source.
Thank god this is something (aka nonproduct) that will never see any part of production, even though given 2 sheets of plywood, some aluminum stock and a steamer, I could technically reproduce the overall look of this bike in a matter of days. Paint of course is strictly optional, and for an extra 1000 I could roll on any color you want, let me go to home depot for the color samples first.
Jimbo says
I’d love to ride this across a large bridge in a crosswind… :-S
Interesting certainly, as for practicality, I think anyone could spend all day picking it apart for it’s flaws, what we should be doing is focusing on what it has done right, and building on that!
It’s definitely creating a stir, even as a concept 🙂
Shaine says
It looks like someone watched a Tron marathon and then went to his sketch pad. Maybe nUCLEUS Mk II or Mk III will look a little more stream-lined. I love the no kickstand idea…
I understand this is “an alternative fuel motorbike concept” – but to sell the idea to someone else it needs some refining. The builder is right “motorcycles shouldn’t mimic one another but instead should DO things differently;” not ride differently.
I’ve been the test pilot on a few bike builds – but this one I’d hand this one off to someone else. It does get the brain-juice flowing though…
Bryan says
This is what happens when a clerk from Home Depot mixes drugs and motorcycle design.
I think we should make this Lukic guy build and actually ride the thing. This would solve the problem of him designing stupid things in the future. Darwinism at work.
ROHORN says
Has anyone ever seen a folding bicycle produced in the UK a few years ago (and since gone) called the “Skoot”? Not much different. Good pictures, especially of it folded, are uncommon.
I wonder if the line of official nUCLOTHING is out yet – and if the jacket will look a bit like a sandwich board…….
Robbie says
It is a good thing that some of the responders to this post were not around when the Wright Brothers were playing with powered kites, or when Edison was doing his thing. But perhaps there was people like this and they were also ignored thankfully. Keep working Lukic.
JF says
Are you kidding? You’re comparing this guy to the Wright Brothers and Edison?? They invented useful, functional items. Where’s the invention here? Where’s the usefulness? At best this is art – it’s not a motorcycle.
B.Case says
Um, the Wright Bros raised the bar by attempting to do something no known person had done before, i.e. powered flight. That comment was just silly…
While I respect this designer’s intent to raise questions about what a hypothetical alternative-fueled bike should be, I believe there is one blaring omission – the rider. I do believe that motorcycles are another form of fashion, and fashion isn’t always about fit and comfort. But then again, your clothes can’t really put your life in danger if you try to ride them. So maybe the motorcycle designer does have some obligation to raise the bar on safety and comfort, while exploring new shapes and materials.
But this is just my individual opinion. I guess I tend to be drawn more towards engineered concepts rather than fantasy. Surely, the design world can’t exist without either.
Things like the new Schuberth helmet and the Dainese D-Air system really excite me.
B.Case says
Also, is it me or does it look like the front forks are set at a rake angle similar to traditional bikes, yet the handle bars are pivoting in a plane parallel to the ground?
I know it’s just a concept, but unless there’s some extra “hidden” linkage, that would be impossible. I guess if the concept of this front suspension was intended to retract somehow, then might there be some novel linkage in there??
Robbie says
Do you really think that what the Wright Brothers first came up with was seen by anyone other than themselves to something “useful”.
Just because its not ‘mainstream’ doesn’t make it wrong. Its just different, why are so many people afraid of this?
B.Case says
Sorry, Robbie, but your implication that people are “afraid” of this concept just made your position weaker. Overall, the 30+ comments above are surprisingly open minded, which is a good indication that people generally understand the purpose of a “blue sky” concept rendering.
I personally don’t care for bloggers who attempt to instigate a separate debate that has no basis.
I stick with my original comment, that your comparison of the concept above to the admittedly unpopular flying contraption used in the world’s first recorded powered flight, is absolutely silly. You’ll need to find a better leg to stand on than that, friend.
garron frantzen says
why doesn’t it have square wheels?
even nature abhors a straight line.
There’s so much more to aerodynamics than just a sharp leading edge and minimal frontal profile.
……no wonder SR-71’s are so slow.
Murb says
I don’t know what anyone else may say about the looks, but personally it’s already kinda growing on me lol, I first saw it and went “dear god” but the more i look at it the more it seems cool and interesting. That being said, since it wouldn’t necesarily function it kinda defeats the purpose, maybe if it was a bit more streamlined from other angles so it would be safer and actual usability? It seems like the designer thought about like driving like long highways only and no other wind then your forward motion. But if they could make it safe and usable, hell i’d love to get it, try it at least, even if my taste is a lil weird lol. And the idea of it kinda, laying down and standing up? pretty cool, would love to see ideas on how to do that safely. Gonna go see if there is anything else out there besides just the autocad style pictures and rendered vid, maybe internal renders?
garron says
re:wright brothers comment
of course other people had the vision.they weren’t the only ones.there’s considerable evidence that there was at least one other powered flight prior to theirs,in Texas,not to mention centuries of artistic and scientific references to man’s quest for flight.
As far as designs like this being somehow considered genius when in fact they are only bizarre,it takes more than this to establish that the majority of conclusions being reached on an engineering or aesthetic level can be written off as merely “rutted thinking”.That’s why it’s called “common sense”.
Again,I must state that it is ridiculous to compare a design like this with something as timeless and universal as man’s fascination with flight.
This design has significant and numerous problems that have already been noted by others.
As far as the up/down parking mechanism,there are already air-ride choppers out there that have been doing this for a while.
I would simply advise the designer to stick to streamliners in the bicycle realm.