<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motus V4 Engine Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorNine</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/#comment-278525</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorNine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=11900#comment-278525</guid>
		<description>At full bore, that engine sounds like a T-Rex screaming its rage.
Damn, it&#039;s gonna be fun to ride one of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At full bore, that engine sounds like a T-Rex screaming its rage.<br />
Damn, it&#8217;s gonna be fun to ride one of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/#comment-278242</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=11900#comment-278242</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t understand the logic of a so-called &#039;clean sheet&#039; design - where they turn the drive 90 degrees and then run it again through a chain or belt? Whether or not those are good in themselves, it&#039;s just unecessarily wasted force turning it around, surely... 

Why not straight-line engine to drive-shaft?

Apparently chains are more efficient - tell that to the 99% of riders who don&#039;t tension it before every ride and end up with much less...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand the logic of a so-called &#8216;clean sheet&#8217; design &#8211; where they turn the drive 90 degrees and then run it again through a chain or belt? Whether or not those are good in themselves, it&#8217;s just unecessarily wasted force turning it around, surely&#8230; </p>
<p>Why not straight-line engine to drive-shaft?</p>
<p>Apparently chains are more efficient &#8211; tell that to the 99% of riders who don&#8217;t tension it before every ride and end up with much less&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoes4Industry</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/#comment-278232</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoes4Industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=11900#comment-278232</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of the V-4 tractor motor that was in my old &#039;68 SAAB. A great car btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of the V-4 tractor motor that was in my old &#8217;68 SAAB. A great car btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HRR</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/#comment-278155</link>
		<dc:creator>HRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=11900#comment-278155</guid>
		<description>Here is where this concept strikes a chord with me (and obviously others):

1. It&#039;s American- conceived, designed and built in the good &#039;ol USA.

2. It&#039;s based on the proven (and much loved) American V-8, which instills confidence, pride, and promises a sound that can bring a tear to your eye.

3. The intended target is the high-end sport-touring buyer who has the experience, the taste, and the money to appreciate and afford this motorcycle.

4. They do not seem overly concerned with how it&#039;s done in Europe or Japan, which makes sense because this concept is not trying to &quot;win over&quot; customers- this bike is creating a new market segment altogether.

5. Although many of us love the racing aspect, I see no need for this concept to have any ties with current racing specs.  This is a &quot;stand-alone&quot; design concept that doesn&#039;t need to have a racing componet.  If anything, when this bike proves successful I can envision a racing series being created around this engine- throwing the currently accepted Euro and Japanese-centric displacement rules out the window.

6. It&#039;s different- in a distinctly American way, and that creates a demand one feels in the gut that is hard to describe... or ignore.  I would very much like to have one of these motorcycles, and it appears I am not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is where this concept strikes a chord with me (and obviously others):</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s American- conceived, designed and built in the good &#8216;ol USA.</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s based on the proven (and much loved) American V-8, which instills confidence, pride, and promises a sound that can bring a tear to your eye.</p>
<p>3. The intended target is the high-end sport-touring buyer who has the experience, the taste, and the money to appreciate and afford this motorcycle.</p>
<p>4. They do not seem overly concerned with how it&#8217;s done in Europe or Japan, which makes sense because this concept is not trying to &#8220;win over&#8221; customers- this bike is creating a new market segment altogether.</p>
<p>5. Although many of us love the racing aspect, I see no need for this concept to have any ties with current racing specs.  This is a &#8220;stand-alone&#8221; design concept that doesn&#8217;t need to have a racing componet.  If anything, when this bike proves successful I can envision a racing series being created around this engine- throwing the currently accepted Euro and Japanese-centric displacement rules out the window.</p>
<p>6. It&#8217;s different- in a distinctly American way, and that creates a demand one feels in the gut that is hard to describe&#8230; or ignore.  I would very much like to have one of these motorcycles, and it appears I am not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawg</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2010/07/02/motus-v4-engine-video/#comment-278150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=11900#comment-278150</guid>
		<description>Looks, and sounds, like a lovely engine - for something with more than two wheels. I respect them for building it, but as has been said it has limited applications as far as bikes go, unlike Triumphs triples or BMW&#039;s Parallel twin 800. Would be good in a light weight sports car such as a Caterham 7.

That said, I&#039;d bet they could build a bike lighter than Yamaha&#039;s new Super Tenere! And their logo is cool and classic. I wish them all the best and hope to see a lovely new American motorcycle.

Just remembered what a classic the VMAX has become, maybe they have something after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks, and sounds, like a lovely engine &#8211; for something with more than two wheels. I respect them for building it, but as has been said it has limited applications as far as bikes go, unlike Triumphs triples or BMW&#8217;s Parallel twin 800. Would be good in a light weight sports car such as a Caterham 7.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d bet they could build a bike lighter than Yamaha&#8217;s new Super Tenere! And their logo is cool and classic. I wish them all the best and hope to see a lovely new American motorcycle.</p>
<p>Just remembered what a classic the VMAX has become, maybe they have something after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

