Comments on: Rockstar Hayabusa – a Subtle but Radical Custom

By: agito

agito — Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:24:30 +0000

this is kind of stupid considering the tail of the busa and the whole body in fact are part of the secret that drives the busa stock at such high speeds. removing those aerodynamically engineered parts..is yes very stupid.

By: todd

todd — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:49:57 +0000

Wouldn’t the rear single-sided swing arm cause a lot of flex, especially considering how much power it has to transfer into the frame? Looks like a victim of fashion to me.
What’s the point of this anyway? There really isn’t that much difference in power between the Busa and the GSXR.

-todd

By: john

john — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:23:09 +0000

i personally would choose an gsxr cause this one looks lite at the back but massive and heavy at the front and that ruins wheelies;)
so if they can make it look lite at the front to it would be an true winner with no competition at speed,great looks and agility(maybe not that much at agility)

By: Brad S.

Brad S. — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:47:16 +0000

Well the Makita bike Sure looks good but, it RUNS even better!! With the lighter tail section and single sided ( Greggs ) swing arm, this bike really likes it when you get into her throttle, if you know what I mean….. And since we have it at our shop ( Roaring Toyz )…..I think we might have a talk about bringing the ass end out of the air…..Don’t think we’ll do anything about the rear sets but, you never know…..Hell, we could just tear her down and start all over again….

B. Sexton – RTZ

By: Eddie

Eddie — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:45:51 +0000

As a lover of 1000s, I would quicker buy this bike than the stock Busa, I think the tail’ slightness contrasts well with the front ends toughness, giving the bike a totally battle ready look (very radical) and knowing that this kind of upgrade is possible on a busa, i think my next bike will be a busa.