<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Drops Motorcycle Smog Check Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Dynge</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/#comment-279358</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Dynge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=6155#comment-279358</guid>
		<description>Senator Pavley is still trying her best to get her piece of s**t bill passed.  This time as a ticket to any exhaust without the EPA stamp. Anything for a buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Pavley is still trying her best to get her piece of s**t bill passed.  This time as a ticket to any exhaust without the EPA stamp. Anything for a buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auntie Smoggie</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/#comment-278172</link>
		<dc:creator>Auntie Smoggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=6155#comment-278172</guid>
		<description>Make sure you write to Senator Fran Pavley D-Agoura Hills regarding bill 435 to let her know you oppose it. Here is what I wrote:

Senator Fran Pavley D-Agoura Hills bill 435 is well intended, but will do little to alleviate noise and will only anger the motorcyclists who already have a quiet motorcycle, which is most owners. Why punish the thousands of riders in the state for the abuse caused by a few?  I am sure that the owners of bikes with loud mufflers will only put on their original stock muffler for the ride to the check point and get their sticker, only to ride home and spend 5 minutes putting on their loud pipes. 

To alleviate this, the noise levels should be monitored, not a required stamp that will do little or nothing to stop the noise. Set up a guideline that requires pipes to be less than so many  Decibels at a set distance from the end of the tail pipe while the engine is revved to 3000 RPM&#039;s. Not subjective, etc. No chance to defeat it in court, the decibel meter does not lie and some models cost less then 100 dollars. Then have the enforcement of each bike done by officers on the street. Putting a stamp on the bike will be useless and one more hoop riders have to jump through. I would support a bill requiring Smog Checking of motorcycles to fight the illegal removal of catalytic converters and other pollution control equipment. 

Use her address on the form or it will kick back to you!
2716 Ocean Park Blvd.
Santa Monica, CA 90405 

http://legplcms01.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.aspx?district=SD23</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure you write to Senator Fran Pavley D-Agoura Hills regarding bill 435 to let her know you oppose it. Here is what I wrote:</p>
<p>Senator Fran Pavley D-Agoura Hills bill 435 is well intended, but will do little to alleviate noise and will only anger the motorcyclists who already have a quiet motorcycle, which is most owners. Why punish the thousands of riders in the state for the abuse caused by a few?  I am sure that the owners of bikes with loud mufflers will only put on their original stock muffler for the ride to the check point and get their sticker, only to ride home and spend 5 minutes putting on their loud pipes. </p>
<p>To alleviate this, the noise levels should be monitored, not a required stamp that will do little or nothing to stop the noise. Set up a guideline that requires pipes to be less than so many  Decibels at a set distance from the end of the tail pipe while the engine is revved to 3000 RPM&#8217;s. Not subjective, etc. No chance to defeat it in court, the decibel meter does not lie and some models cost less then 100 dollars. Then have the enforcement of each bike done by officers on the street. Putting a stamp on the bike will be useless and one more hoop riders have to jump through. I would support a bill requiring Smog Checking of motorcycles to fight the illegal removal of catalytic converters and other pollution control equipment. </p>
<p>Use her address on the form or it will kick back to you!<br />
2716 Ocean Park Blvd.<br />
Santa Monica, CA 90405 </p>
<p><a href="http://legplcms01.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.aspx?district=SD23" rel="nofollow">http://legplcms01.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.aspx?district=SD23</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferniherst</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/#comment-246237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferniherst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=6155#comment-246237</guid>
		<description>As questioned by Kelly D., the information about California dropping the Smog Check provision in the revised bill appears to be in error.  The Senate Transportaion committed did pass an ammended bill on 05/28/09.  However a review of that ammendment still very much includes mandatory smog checks for all 2000 and later Class III motocycles (larger than 280cc) beginning in 2012.  In fact, the bill passed the Senate 22 to 17 and is now in the  California Assembly Transportation Committee with a scheduled hearing on 06/29/09.   All can be verified through accessing bill status at senate.ca.gov and at assembly.ca.gov for scheduled hearings under the Transportaion Committee agenda.  Such misinformation also appears to be coming from various sources, resulting in a dangerous drop of interest being expressed by the California motorcycling public. I feel it is imparitive that you let readers know the correct facts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As questioned by Kelly D., the information about California dropping the Smog Check provision in the revised bill appears to be in error.  The Senate Transportaion committed did pass an ammended bill on 05/28/09.  However a review of that ammendment still very much includes mandatory smog checks for all 2000 and later Class III motocycles (larger than 280cc) beginning in 2012.  In fact, the bill passed the Senate 22 to 17 and is now in the  California Assembly Transportation Committee with a scheduled hearing on 06/29/09.   All can be verified through accessing bill status at senate.ca.gov and at assembly.ca.gov for scheduled hearings under the Transportaion Committee agenda.  Such misinformation also appears to be coming from various sources, resulting in a dangerous drop of interest being expressed by the California motorcycling public. I feel it is imparitive that you let readers know the correct facts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoVale46</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/#comment-243182</link>
		<dc:creator>GoVale46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=6155#comment-243182</guid>
		<description>Between this and the rethinking of the lead ban on kids bikes it seems someone is listening and making intelligent decisions. I never would have thought it possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between this and the rethinking of the lead ban on kids bikes it seems someone is listening and making intelligent decisions. I never would have thought it possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kneeslider</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/06/01/california-drops-motorcycle-smog-check-proposal/#comment-243151</link>
		<dc:creator>kneeslider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=6155#comment-243151</guid>
		<description>Kelly, the post is based on the link directly below it from the Silicon Valley Mercury News. If you have more details than the story reports, please share them for the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly, the post is based on the link directly below it from the Silicon Valley Mercury News. If you have more details than the story reports, please share them for the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

