<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Dog 215 Cubic Inch V-Twin &#8211; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/#comment-243260</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=5762#comment-243260</guid>
		<description>OOooooohh! nice! Simple is the trick! True flat top promotes flame travel over that huge expanse and skirtless design reduces mass (a little). Who cares that the connecting rods won&#039;t live past 5000 rpm. How do you use 175 lb/ft torque on a reasonably sized rear tire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOooooohh! nice! Simple is the trick! True flat top promotes flame travel over that huge expanse and skirtless design reduces mass (a little). Who cares that the connecting rods won&#8217;t live past 5000 rpm. How do you use 175 lb/ft torque on a reasonably sized rear tire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/#comment-240285</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=5762#comment-240285</guid>
		<description>Staple that monster on the front of the ACE Cycle Car.  You&#039;d have something then. Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staple that monster on the front of the ACE Cycle Car.  You&#8217;d have something then. Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Nedoma</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/#comment-240241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Nedoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=5762#comment-240241</guid>
		<description>@freeman, re: 300hp at 6000 rpm
the motor will not survive 6000 rpm, not with those con-rods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@freeman, re: 300hp at 6000 rpm<br />
the motor will not survive 6000 rpm, not with those con-rods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nawitus</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/#comment-240076</link>
		<dc:creator>nawitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=5762#comment-240076</guid>
		<description>&#039;there is no way a big twin is going to compete with a multi-valve per cylinder DOHC motor&#039;
My bike is a v-twin with a multi-valve per cylinder DOHC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;there is no way a big twin is going to compete with a multi-valve per cylinder DOHC motor&#8217;<br />
My bike is a v-twin with a multi-valve per cylinder DOHC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/05/11/bad-dog-215-cubic-inch-v-twin-update/#comment-239097</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=5762#comment-239097</guid>
		<description>Ted is right, the speed of the piston can&#039;t be that much given the pistons&#039; size,,, and by not that much I mean VERY slow imho,,, but i&#039;d be happy to be proven wrong,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted is right, the speed of the piston can&#8217;t be that much given the pistons&#8217; size,,, and by not that much I mean VERY slow imho,,, but i&#8217;d be happy to be proven wrong,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

