<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modular Motorcycles &#8211; The Way Forward?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:40:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BillyB</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-182096</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=3093#comment-182096</guid>
		<description>As Gordo pointed out, this is already happening in the custom bike market, based on Harley-Davidson designs.  90% (give or take) of all &quot;custom&quot; bikes built are based on the exact same architecture: the Harley FL-series from the 1950&#039;s. Even when these rigid frames got replaced with swing arms in the 60&#039;s the motor and tranny mounted exactly the same. When the Softail was introduced in the 80&#039;s, it too used the same layout. And most custom bikes are based on that. When a builder says he raised the trans 2-inches or stretched the downtubes by 10, or the backbone by 6, it&#039;s all based off of standard FL architecture. Harley&#039;s newer Twin Cams and all the rubbermount bikes have a different layout, but that&#039;s a whole other topic. You can even get a &quot;standard&quot; style S&amp;S bottom end for a Twin Cam top end so you can fit it in a &quot;standard&quot; custom frame.

Basically in the american custom market, most everything is based on that standard with the exception of frames based on Harley&#039;s other layouts. So effectively, you&#039;ve got what you&#039;re talking about right now. The only problem is a non-unit-construction, air-cooled pushrod-equipped dinosaur motor is only good for so much. It would be cool if you could get a compact, motor-trans unit in single or twin configuration that would fit a number of uses from street to dirt to utility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Gordo pointed out, this is already happening in the custom bike market, based on Harley-Davidson designs.  90% (give or take) of all &#8220;custom&#8221; bikes built are based on the exact same architecture: the Harley FL-series from the 1950&#8217;s. Even when these rigid frames got replaced with swing arms in the 60&#8217;s the motor and tranny mounted exactly the same. When the Softail was introduced in the 80&#8217;s, it too used the same layout. And most custom bikes are based on that. When a builder says he raised the trans 2-inches or stretched the downtubes by 10, or the backbone by 6, it&#8217;s all based off of standard FL architecture. Harley&#8217;s newer Twin Cams and all the rubbermount bikes have a different layout, but that&#8217;s a whole other topic. You can even get a &#8220;standard&#8221; style S&amp;S bottom end for a Twin Cam top end so you can fit it in a &#8220;standard&#8221; custom frame.</p>
<p>Basically in the american custom market, most everything is based on that standard with the exception of frames based on Harley&#8217;s other layouts. So effectively, you&#8217;ve got what you&#8217;re talking about right now. The only problem is a non-unit-construction, air-cooled pushrod-equipped dinosaur motor is only good for so much. It would be cool if you could get a compact, motor-trans unit in single or twin configuration that would fit a number of uses from street to dirt to utility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Case</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-175521</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=3093#comment-175521</guid>
		<description>Well Dave, your comment was too good to pass up. Besides, I do tend to frequent the &#039;Slider if you haven&#039;t noticed. 

That sounds like a good little motor. But it also sounds like a lot of work, and right now I&#039;ve got my hands full. If CAD is all you need, then I&#039;d say there&#039;s plenty of help out there. Having a design that works is the tricky part. Best of luck!

-brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Dave, your comment was too good to pass up. Besides, I do tend to frequent the &#8216;Slider if you haven&#8217;t noticed. </p>
<p>That sounds like a good little motor. But it also sounds like a lot of work, and right now I&#8217;ve got my hands full. If CAD is all you need, then I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s plenty of help out there. Having a design that works is the tricky part. Best of luck!</p>
<p>-brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coho</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-175375</link>
		<dc:creator>coho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=3093#comment-175375</guid>
		<description>Dave,
That is a spectacular idea.  Maybe even better than the Renovatio Sport-Tourer (which I don&#039;t think is ever coming).
I would gladly help with the urban-combat reliability/longevity testing...I&#039;m in Seattle, though, is it waterproof?

Real question: Will the different configurations be user-interchangeable (if one had already purchased the various components)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
That is a spectacular idea.  Maybe even better than the Renovatio Sport-Tourer (which I don&#8217;t think is ever coming).<br />
I would gladly help with the urban-combat reliability/longevity testing&#8230;I&#8217;m in Seattle, though, is it waterproof?</p>
<p>Real question: Will the different configurations be user-interchangeable (if one had already purchased the various components)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-175333</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=3093#comment-175333</guid>
		<description>Ah, Brian... I was hoping you&#039;d pop in..
I could use a man like you for 3D CAD work, to shop this project around.. (much easier to send files, than a real bike)
The motor is from a previous project with Bienville. It&#039;s a 400cc triple air-cooled engine designed by Ian Drysdale. It&#039;s been finalized, and as far as I know, is going through the EPA/CARB process as we speak. There is room for other powerplants built into the design, so that&#039;s always an option for later. Let me know if you&#039;d be interested...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Brian&#8230; I was hoping you&#8217;d pop in..<br />
I could use a man like you for 3D CAD work, to shop this project around.. (much easier to send files, than a real bike)<br />
The motor is from a previous project with Bienville. It&#8217;s a 400cc triple air-cooled engine designed by Ian Drysdale. It&#8217;s been finalized, and as far as I know, is going through the EPA/CARB process as we speak. There is room for other powerplants built into the design, so that&#8217;s always an option for later. Let me know if you&#8217;d be interested&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Case</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/11/10/modular-motorcycles-the-way-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-175315</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=3093#comment-175315</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a great idea Dave. I think there will be a market for this kind of stuff. Same engine in all 5 config&#039;s? What are you using?

-brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great idea Dave. I think there will be a market for this kind of stuff. Same engine in all 5 config&#8217;s? What are you using?</p>
<p>-brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
