Previous: Brudeli 654L Leanster On the Road in Europe
Next: 25 Years of Buell – Book Review


KTM 640 LC4 Single Cylinder Track Bike Project

by Paul Crowe - "The Kneeslider" on 9/29/2008

in Motorcycle Builders, Motorcycle Design

KTM 640 LC4 track bike

KTM 640 LC4 track bikeWhen asked what they want in a motorcycle, some might say narrow, lightweight, great handling single cylinder with plenty of power. That was Kim Kronslev's idea. He looked around, didn't find what he wanted so he designed it and built one, based around the KTM 640 LC4. Although Kim began with the intention of making a road legal bike, his direction changed during the course of the project and what you see is a track only special.

There's not yet much detail from Kim as far as specs go but he started by making CAD drawings of what he had in mind and finished with a track bike. It looks very minimal and super light.

Kim used the tried and true formula: idea + skill + work = real bike. Some really nice motorcycles get their start this way. Once you have something to work with, you can refine it until it's exactly what you want. I like it.

Thanks for the tip, Bob!

More photos and link below:

KTM 640 LC4 track bike

KTM 640 LC4 track bike

Link: Kim Kronslev

Share

{ 25 comments… add yours below ... }

Ry 09.29.08 at 9:44 am

Fine work , I wonder if the choice to make it track only is because of licensing problems though.

Duke 09.29.08 at 10:06 am

That is fine.

Shawn 09.29.08 at 12:18 pm

Nice. Looks like a similar concept to the 450moto.com bikes.

Derek 09.29.08 at 12:38 pm

This thing has got some serious ground clearance

motoxyogi 09.29.08 at 1:34 pm

Nice bike, but curiosty kicks in, whats that cylinder sticking out the front of the sump? An oil filter?

Clive M-Sanders 09.29.08 at 1:35 pm

I dont understand why the exhaust is 2 into 1 if its a single

Sean 09.29.08 at 1:50 pm

Oil filter, yes.

2 into 1, split exhaust ports for the cylinder. Like an XR650.

Dorzok 09.29.08 at 2:06 pm

I guess a good used MZ (MuZ as they were later known)is a little outdated. I can see why he’d start from scratch. Build it, build it, build it!!!

QrazyQat 09.29.08 at 4:32 pm

That looks nice, although in the riding photo it looks like it doesn’t need that much ground clearance, as far as the cornering is concerned. Maybe for weight transfer? I wonder if it’d be better closer to the ground. Still, very nice.

Greybeard 09.29.08 at 6:19 pm

Now, that does look like fun!
Short wheel base/long swing arm…gotta flick like a switchblade!

tim 09.29.08 at 7:51 pm

stunning! There are rumours of an RC4 but Ive seen nothing confirmed (RC4 would be street legal). Guess this guy got sick of waiting. Great stuff!

hoyt 09.29.08 at 9:03 pm

Lowering the bike would probably complicate rear suspension config. if the desired wheelbase should remain as seen above. (it would require linkages)

hoyt 09.29.08 at 9:06 pm

…plus, he probably wanted the crank shaft and front sprocket centerline close to the axle centerline

B*A*M*F 09.29.08 at 10:04 pm

Serious moto wood here. That’s really nice and looks pretty professional. Though I generally agree with this post’s equation, I think it’s more accurately summed up thusly:

idea + skill + work + *money* = real bike

FREEMAN 09.30.08 at 2:15 am

I’m a big fan of the single cylinder bikes. Huge kudos for making your very own.

zipidachimp 09.30.08 at 4:31 am

please, someone kill the trend of underseat exhausts, and high tail ends. this bike would look really cool with both a low reverse cone and a convential bum stop.

zipidachimp 09.30.08 at 4:34 am

sorry, that was ‘reverse cone megaphone’.

VMX1000 09.30.08 at 6:02 am

Very well executed from model to real life, nice!

Mark 09.30.08 at 9:11 am

Looks absolutely fantastic to me, if it had a numberplate and headlight it might even be a challenger for the title of “perfect bike”! I can understand that getting it registered is probably more legal hassle than it’s worth though, especially in Europe.

Blair 09.30.08 at 1:55 pm

I wonder if he’s working on a full faring kit, although that may be one of the trickier parts to get visually right. I love what he’s got so far.

todd 09.30.08 at 3:27 pm

nice, I agree with zipidachimp. This is like my GB500 but with twice the power and much better suspension and brakes… which makes me also agree with B*A*M*F about the “money” thing.

-todd

B*A*M*F 09.30.08 at 6:55 pm

Todd, you’re a lucky man to have GB500.

About 2 years ago I was constructing a budget to build my own bike for a cross country adventure. I started pricing pre-made components that I would buy (engine, lights, etc.), and then I started figuring up costs on likes like tubing, paint, and the like. Even using used parts whenever possible, I couldn’t make the numbers work well enough to have anything left for the trip.

I really admire anyone who goes ahead and builds a bike, because it’s never cheap. Even if the dollar amount was low, the hours involved were still huge.

Kronslev 10.01.08 at 3:05 pm

Well…I think this needs a big thanks from the creator himself.
I’m really surprised to find my project here on Kneeslider, and I want to thank you all for the comments.

A few comments myself:
The ground clearance is a product of the rear swingarm geometry, as hoyt has figured out.
The missing license plate is purely because of mad legislation here in Denmark.
The original idea for the exhaust was below the engine, just like the new KTM Duke. This would have been nicer as zipidachimp points out, but it became too bulky if it was going to be effective (big volume), so functionality won over looks.
I am working on a small bikini fairing and a proper seat, but I can’t find anything suitable to modify, so I have to start from scratch, and this is quite tedious.
And money is a part of the equation. I could have had an exotic italian race bike for what this project cost, but that would not have been a third of the fun I have had now.
I’m not in favour of showing off, but I try to promote the idea of creating our own projects. It will never pay off money wise to do projects like this, but it’s really great fun and exiting. The downside is that it’s addictive, so I’m working on two new ideas for future projects.

Some basic data:
Weight: 130 kg including oil and water.
Power: 55 HP at the rear wheel
Wheelbase/Rake/Trail: 1350 mm/66 deg/87 mm
Tyres: 120/60-17 front and 150/60-17 rear
Brakes: PFM Race caliper and disc with custom hub
Front end: Ohlins FG845 fork with custom tripple clamps and custom caliper mount
Engine: Standard (now old) LC4 with Keihin FCR 41 carb and custom exhaust
Not as flickable as it can seem, but very neutral with no tendencies to any wallowing.
And above all: Great fun to build and to ride

dennon 10.09.08 at 7:52 pm

Very nice bike, almost every manufacturer builds a great enduro bike. It makes me wonder why none of them are putting these great light and compact engines into a sport bike. Properly set up they would have a great handling fun bike with less of the top speed license losing potential.

Single Minded 03.22.09 at 1:44 pm

All bikes should be singles, just like there’s only one design for a race-horse – or should we clone one with 6 or 8 legs?

So, ... what do YOU think?

The Kneeslider does not endorse nor imply agreement with any particular comment just because we let it stand, but, you already knew that.

Comments should be closely related to post content. Personal attacks, personal grievances and profanity will be removed. Please read the entire post and check for included links before commenting or asking questions. We're looking for your interesting thoughts and ideas that add to the conversation. Thank you.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

The reCaptcha form below has become necessary to reduce spam comments. If you can't read the words, please use the reload button (the 2 curved arrows just above the speaker symbol) for a new challenge. Thanks for your help! - "The Kneeslider"