<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 AMD World Championship Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:40:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rasmus</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/comment-page-1/#comment-137921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1929#comment-137921</guid>
		<description>The StG Nautilus is pretty cool. It reminds me of those twisted drawings of normal cars with really big wheels and spoilers and stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The StG Nautilus is pretty cool. It reminds me of those twisted drawings of normal cars with really big wheels and spoilers and stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jar</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/comment-page-1/#comment-137346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1929#comment-137346</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m down with the accessibility thought, too.  So much out there for the HD derivatives, you can slam a good starting point together quickly, if not inexpensively.

The RC51 concept rolling in my head is less road bike, and more fat tire straightline bike.  Why chase power, when you can have it?  The only catch is the accessibility - you - have to build around it, not gonna be a lot of help.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down with the accessibility thought, too.  So much out there for the HD derivatives, you can slam a good starting point together quickly, if not inexpensively.</p>
<p>The RC51 concept rolling in my head is less road bike, and more fat tire straightline bike.  Why chase power, when you can have it?  The only catch is the accessibility &#8211; you &#8211; have to build around it, not gonna be a lot of help&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoyt</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/comment-page-1/#comment-137308</link>
		<dc:creator>hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1929#comment-137308</guid>
		<description>Agreed, that the HD motor is accessible and the right engine tuner can extrude more power than many give credit.....

However, builders like Goldammer can build one-off motors that probably work quite well.  And, if it does break, he would know how to fix it and/or re-build it so the part doesn&#039;t break again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, that the HD motor is accessible and the right engine tuner can extrude more power than many give credit&#8230;..</p>
<p>However, builders like Goldammer can build one-off motors that probably work quite well.  And, if it does break, he would know how to fix it and/or re-build it so the part doesn&#8217;t break again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/comment-page-1/#comment-137301</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1929#comment-137301</guid>
		<description>accessible.  hit the nail on the head.  why make a bike with a one off motor.  it will break eventually and your gonna wanna fix it.  very good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>accessible.  hit the nail on the head.  why make a bike with a one off motor.  it will break eventually and your gonna wanna fix it.  very good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WRXer</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/08/10/2008-amd-world-championship-results/comment-page-1/#comment-137165</link>
		<dc:creator>WRXer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1929#comment-137165</guid>
		<description>I agree that the V-twin in it&#039;s many forms (Ducati, Indian, Vincent, J.A.P., Metric) is one of the most pleasing engine styles. To me the Pre-war H-D engines are among the best particularly the flathead. After the war they lose something for me. Maybe it&#039;s because they are too common that they have lost their charm.

This is not to say a multi cannot also be pleasing.  
-The old Indian four made a helluva visual statement. 
-The Honda Valkyrie was one of the best looking cruisers ever...mainly because it was different, and looked tough.
-The Triumph Rocket 3 engine is in this vein, but to be honest, it looks a little too &quot;Functional&quot;....a bit too automotive. A case of too much function and not enough form, which is contrary to the old British design philosphy of &quot;if it doesn&#039;t look right...it isn&#039;t right&quot;.

Still right here on the Kneeslider we have seen really impressive customs can be made using the Rocket 3.

The possibilities are there if builders want to explore it, it&#039;s just that HD parts are so accessible, it&#039;s surely the easist route to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the V-twin in it&#8217;s many forms (Ducati, Indian, Vincent, J.A.P., Metric) is one of the most pleasing engine styles. To me the Pre-war H-D engines are among the best particularly the flathead. After the war they lose something for me. Maybe it&#8217;s because they are too common that they have lost their charm.</p>
<p>This is not to say a multi cannot also be pleasing.<br />
-The old Indian four made a helluva visual statement.<br />
-The Honda Valkyrie was one of the best looking cruisers ever&#8230;mainly because it was different, and looked tough.<br />
-The Triumph Rocket 3 engine is in this vein, but to be honest, it looks a little too &#8220;Functional&#8221;&#8230;.a bit too automotive. A case of too much function and not enough form, which is contrary to the old British design philosphy of &#8220;if it doesn&#8217;t look right&#8230;it isn&#8217;t right&#8221;.</p>
<p>Still right here on the Kneeslider we have seen really impressive customs can be made using the Rocket 3.</p>
<p>The possibilities are there if builders want to explore it, it&#8217;s just that HD parts are so accessible, it&#8217;s surely the easist route to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
