<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Superbike and Literbike Racing Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:34:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FredM</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-128596</link>
		<dc:creator>FredM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/#comment-128596</guid>
		<description>I wish that they would put together rules that required truly stock &quot;open-class&quot; bikes with nothing changed but tires and removal of street paraphernalia.  

I don&#039;t want to know what a bike will do with racing fuel, massive changes to the engine, modified chassis geometry (e.g. rake), different brakes, and carbon fiber body panels.  I want to know what the one on the showroom floor will do.  

If manufacturer X builds the fastest bike, then don&#039;t penalize them with additional weight, restrictor plates, etc.  

And get rid of the horsepower limit.  Just require that the engines be factory stock and not balanced, blueprinted, massaged, or tweaked.

I don&#039;t want to encourage the manufacturers to sell us a bike on Monday that shares nothing with Sunday&#039;s race bike save the name and appearance.

This would have the added appeal of making racing affordable and leveling the field for privateers.  If a privateer can go into a dealership and buy the exact same bike being raced by the factory, then it all comes down to the rider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that they would put together rules that required truly stock &#8220;open-class&#8221; bikes with nothing changed but tires and removal of street paraphernalia.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to know what a bike will do with racing fuel, massive changes to the engine, modified chassis geometry (e.g. rake), different brakes, and carbon fiber body panels.  I want to know what the one on the showroom floor will do.  </p>
<p>If manufacturer X builds the fastest bike, then don&#8217;t penalize them with additional weight, restrictor plates, etc.  </p>
<p>And get rid of the horsepower limit.  Just require that the engines be factory stock and not balanced, blueprinted, massaged, or tweaked.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to encourage the manufacturers to sell us a bike on Monday that shares nothing with Sunday&#8217;s race bike save the name and appearance.</p>
<p>This would have the added appeal of making racing affordable and leveling the field for privateers.  If a privateer can go into a dealership and buy the exact same bike being raced by the factory, then it all comes down to the rider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyrider650</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-128405</link>
		<dc:creator>easyrider650</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/#comment-128405</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s awesome. I hope we see teams move outside the big four, because this could really get exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s awesome. I hope we see teams move outside the big four, because this could really get exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motoxyogi</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-128299</link>
		<dc:creator>motoxyogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/#comment-128299</guid>
		<description>@aaron
Probably because there are not enough units imported to the us, but then that doesn&#039;t explain why the s1000 is in there. I think they were designed with WSB in mind rather than any national race championship.
Love to see if anyone will take the 312r.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@aaron<br />
Probably because there are not enough units imported to the us, but then that doesn&#8217;t explain why the s1000 is in there. I think they were designed with WSB in mind rather than any national race championship.<br />
Love to see if anyone will take the 312r.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-128289</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2008/05/30/new-superbike-and-literbike-racing-rules/#comment-128289</guid>
		<description>I wonder why the 1200cc rc8 is included, but the 1200cc ducati 1098r is not.  the 1098s gives up 100cc to the ktm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why the 1200cc rc8 is included, but the 1200cc ducati 1098r is not.  the 1098s gives up 100cc to the ktm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
