<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: V-Quad 4 Cylinder Engine Follow Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:40:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: QuantumCat</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-128134</link>
		<dc:creator>QuantumCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/#comment-128134</guid>
		<description>How come people aren&#039;t warming up to this?
I&#039;d love to have a HD V4! I&#039;ve been contemplating on how to connect them -but alas, I am a physicist, I know more about nanophysics than about mechanicanical stuff :-(

Next to that I love the way thay kept the engine slim, no abotion-legspread like you have with the Boss Hoss, for instance!

AND the ability to fit it in a stock frame (I&#039;m kind of biassed in favour of the FXR)

Too bad the engine will be a tag too expensive to buy, let alone to ship it to Holland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come people aren&#8217;t warming up to this?<br />
I&#8217;d love to have a HD V4! I&#8217;ve been contemplating on how to connect them -but alas, I am a physicist, I know more about nanophysics than about mechanicanical stuff <img src='http://thekneeslider.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Next to that I love the way thay kept the engine slim, no abotion-legspread like you have with the Boss Hoss, for instance!</p>
<p>AND the ability to fit it in a stock frame (I&#8217;m kind of biassed in favour of the FXR)</p>
<p>Too bad the engine will be a tag too expensive to buy, let alone to ship it to Holland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guitargeek</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-85858</link>
		<dc:creator>guitargeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/#comment-85858</guid>
		<description>Two stories about the twin Harley, yet when I search The Kneeslider for &quot;Millyard&quot; I get nothing.  

It&#039;s real neat that this guy put two Harley engines together side by side, and I certainly don&#039;t want to take anything away from his achievement, but I&#039;m curious why there&#039;s no mention anywhere about Allen Millyard&#039;s various KZs, especially the 2300cc V12.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two stories about the twin Harley, yet when I search The Kneeslider for &#8220;Millyard&#8221; I get nothing.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s real neat that this guy put two Harley engines together side by side, and I certainly don&#8217;t want to take anything away from his achievement, but I&#8217;m curious why there&#8217;s no mention anywhere about Allen Millyard&#8217;s various KZs, especially the 2300cc V12.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discontinuuity</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-85777</link>
		<dc:creator>discontinuuity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/#comment-85777</guid>
		<description>Why would you run them so they fire at the same time?  Wouldn&#039;t that create horrible vibration?  I guess if you&#039;ve already got a 45 degree V-twin, vibration isn&#039;t your biggest issue, but it still sounds like a bad idea to me.  Didn&#039;t Ducati did the same thing on their V-4 racing motor?  Is it because they want all of the vibration to be in one plane only?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you run them so they fire at the same time?  Wouldn&#8217;t that create horrible vibration?  I guess if you&#8217;ve already got a 45 degree V-twin, vibration isn&#8217;t your biggest issue, but it still sounds like a bad idea to me.  Didn&#8217;t Ducati did the same thing on their V-4 racing motor?  Is it because they want all of the vibration to be in one plane only?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OTTOMAN</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-85664</link>
		<dc:creator>OTTOMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/#comment-85664</guid>
		<description>WELL I MUST ADMITT, IT DOES LOOK BETTER THEN I THOUGHT. BUT IAM WONDERING WHAT MAINTANCE MUST BE LIKE [ADJUSTING PUSH RODS TIMEING AND SUCH]. ALSO HOW ARE THEY CONNECTED . I DIDNT READ OR SEE THAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL I MUST ADMITT, IT DOES LOOK BETTER THEN I THOUGHT. BUT IAM WONDERING WHAT MAINTANCE MUST BE LIKE [ADJUSTING PUSH RODS TIMEING AND SUCH]. ALSO HOW ARE THEY CONNECTED . I DIDNT READ OR SEE THAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-85614</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/07/23/v-quad-4-cylinder-engine-follow-up/#comment-85614</guid>
		<description>I think the V-4 design is awesome but it should be 100ci total displacement. The smaller cylinder size would allow the compression ratio to be increased in each cylinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the V-4 design is awesome but it should be 100ci total displacement. The smaller cylinder size would allow the compression ratio to be increased in each cylinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
