<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Bear Miss Behavin Chopper for Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:34:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-62702</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/#comment-62702</guid>
		<description>The CBR is hardly small.  I guess if you compare it to the last few years of 600&#039;s, sure it&#039;s smaller.  Take a look at a Hawk GT or GPZ550, those things are tiny and still handle great.  The Ninja 250 I mentioned earlier was designed to be lower and smaller at the outset and despite its age is still one of the best handling sport bikes available.  I agree that lowering a bike will mess with its geometry and handling but that&#039;s not the question.  The point of the whole post was about why manufacturers no longer design good handling bikes for shorter people.
-todd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBR is hardly small.  I guess if you compare it to the last few years of 600&#8217;s, sure it&#8217;s smaller.  Take a look at a Hawk GT or GPZ550, those things are tiny and still handle great.  The Ninja 250 I mentioned earlier was designed to be lower and smaller at the outset and despite its age is still one of the best handling sport bikes available.  I agree that lowering a bike will mess with its geometry and handling but that&#8217;s not the question.  The point of the whole post was about why manufacturers no longer design good handling bikes for shorter people.<br />
-todd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Letorney</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-62699</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Letorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/#comment-62699</guid>
		<description>Check out the new Honda CBR600RR (2007)it is the smallest and most compact 600 ever.  As a sales manager for a large dealership I can tell you we have been asking for a smaller sport bike for our smaller riders for as long as I can remember.  The problem is that the 600 class is the industries bread and butter and they are nothing short today of a race bike with lights .  The suspension of these bikes is a key part of the overall design of the bikes performance and unfortunately lowering these bikes can give them some very unsafe handling characteristics.  Another good choice for a smaller person is the Ducati 748 or 749 very narrow, light and exceptional handling.  I also recomend any rider buying a new 600 or any sport bike for that matter make sure your suspension is set right for your weight and if you weigh less than a 150lbs you need to change out the rear spring.  Stock springs are for the avg weight rider 155 - 185, and you will enjoy your bike so much more with a softer spring, Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the new Honda CBR600RR (2007)it is the smallest and most compact 600 ever.  As a sales manager for a large dealership I can tell you we have been asking for a smaller sport bike for our smaller riders for as long as I can remember.  The problem is that the 600 class is the industries bread and butter and they are nothing short today of a race bike with lights .  The suspension of these bikes is a key part of the overall design of the bikes performance and unfortunately lowering these bikes can give them some very unsafe handling characteristics.  Another good choice for a smaller person is the Ducati 748 or 749 very narrow, light and exceptional handling.  I also recomend any rider buying a new 600 or any sport bike for that matter make sure your suspension is set right for your weight and if you weigh less than a 150lbs you need to change out the rear spring.  Stock springs are for the avg weight rider 155 &#8211; 185, and you will enjoy your bike so much more with a softer spring, Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-62596</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/#comment-62596</guid>
		<description>I agree with Todd, they build also  Mini Sportbikes for kids.
So there must be a possibility for a Sportbike between!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Todd, they build also  Mini Sportbikes for kids.<br />
So there must be a possibility for a Sportbike between!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-62587</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/#comment-62587</guid>
		<description>Todd, there are several reasons why sport bikes are higher.  Here are two:

1. To increase ground clearance for cornering.  (The typical cruiser can lean 45 degrees, and the typical sportbike can lean 50 or more.)

2. No self-respecting sportbike manufacturer uses a dry sump lubrication system, with an external oil tank and attendant leaks.  In a wet sump system, the engine contains the oil at the bottom, and this makes the bike taller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, there are several reasons why sport bikes are higher.  Here are two:</p>
<p>1. To increase ground clearance for cornering.  (The typical cruiser can lean 45 degrees, and the typical sportbike can lean 50 or more.)</p>
<p>2. No self-respecting sportbike manufacturer uses a dry sump lubrication system, with an external oil tank and attendant leaks.  In a wet sump system, the engine contains the oil at the bottom, and this makes the bike taller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-62453</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2007/01/03/big-bear-miss-behavin-chopper-for-women/#comment-62453</guid>
		<description>From reading those responses from women, I seem to recall the problem wasn&#039;t with choppers or cruisers but with sport bikes.  I don&#039;t know what it would take to build a R6 with a low seat but then again I don&#039;t know why they have to be so jacked up high in the first place.  The bike that most accentuates this trend is the new Ducati Sport Classic(s).  It looks like a motocross bike in the rear and like it&#039;s tied down on a trailer in front.  Maybe someone will eventually address the shorter sport bike (Ninja 250 doesn&#039;t count) problem but for now sporty shorter riders are stuck with cruisers or a single tip-toe reach.
-todd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From reading those responses from women, I seem to recall the problem wasn&#8217;t with choppers or cruisers but with sport bikes.  I don&#8217;t know what it would take to build a R6 with a low seat but then again I don&#8217;t know why they have to be so jacked up high in the first place.  The bike that most accentuates this trend is the new Ducati Sport Classic(s).  It looks like a motocross bike in the rear and like it&#8217;s tied down on a trailer in front.  Maybe someone will eventually address the shorter sport bike (Ninja 250 doesn&#8217;t count) problem but for now sporty shorter riders are stuck with cruisers or a single tip-toe reach.<br />
-todd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
