<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S&amp;S X-Wedge V-Twin Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:34:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-87778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/#comment-87778</guid>
		<description>Just got through reading the article in the September issue of CW on the Wedge. S&amp;S has thier own softail frame and will offer a rolling chassis for your build. I for one love the looks of this engine and can&#039;t wait to hear what this 3 Cammer sounds like, much less how it feels to gas it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got through reading the article in the September issue of CW on the Wedge. S&amp;S has thier own softail frame and will offer a rolling chassis for your build. I for one love the looks of this engine and can&#8217;t wait to hear what this 3 Cammer sounds like, much less how it feels to gas it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-85418</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/#comment-85418</guid>
		<description>S&amp;S sort of missed the mark here with this X-Wedge engine.

For one the sound.  Harley people, or those who have been S&amp;S engine buyers in the past, love the noise a 45 degree V-Twin makes.  A 56 degree engine should sound very much like a generic Honda or Suzuki.  Might look good parked, but fire it up for a potential buyer and watch them disappear.  The appearance of &quot;BAD&quot; just got muted down to &quot;Universal Japanese&quot;.  Made in USA or not, it won&#039;t project the image their targeted customers want.

Also the issue of requiring manufacturers to tool up special chassis layouts just to use this engine?  S&amp;S is asking for a new redesign.  Did they help pay the chassis R&amp;D expenses required by the companies who will purchase this engine?  Manufacturers who buy this engine should have told S&amp;S that they hold the cash and that they are S&amp;S&#039;s customers and not the other way around.
  
Next, the potential market for replacement engines that could bolt directly into existing frame designs has been abandoned by the S&amp;S people.  

Overall, S&amp;S is not Harley.  They don&#039;t have the clout or reputation Harley does.  (Can you imagine Harley ditching their &quot;trademark&quot; sound?)  Also I feel S&amp;S have not taken into account the needs of their customers, the individuals and the companies that buy their product.  Emissions issues could easily have been addressed by using existing 45 degree engine layout designs.  Harley will sort the emissions problems out, S&amp;S would have been better served by using their R&amp;D cash to build along existing lines, not pushing it&#039;s own agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;S sort of missed the mark here with this X-Wedge engine.</p>
<p>For one the sound.  Harley people, or those who have been S&amp;S engine buyers in the past, love the noise a 45 degree V-Twin makes.  A 56 degree engine should sound very much like a generic Honda or Suzuki.  Might look good parked, but fire it up for a potential buyer and watch them disappear.  The appearance of &#8220;BAD&#8221; just got muted down to &#8220;Universal Japanese&#8221;.  Made in USA or not, it won&#8217;t project the image their targeted customers want.</p>
<p>Also the issue of requiring manufacturers to tool up special chassis layouts just to use this engine?  S&amp;S is asking for a new redesign.  Did they help pay the chassis R&amp;D expenses required by the companies who will purchase this engine?  Manufacturers who buy this engine should have told S&amp;S that they hold the cash and that they are S&amp;S&#8217;s customers and not the other way around.</p>
<p>Next, the potential market for replacement engines that could bolt directly into existing frame designs has been abandoned by the S&amp;S people.  </p>
<p>Overall, S&amp;S is not Harley.  They don&#8217;t have the clout or reputation Harley does.  (Can you imagine Harley ditching their &#8220;trademark&#8221; sound?)  Also I feel S&amp;S have not taken into account the needs of their customers, the individuals and the companies that buy their product.  Emissions issues could easily have been addressed by using existing 45 degree engine layout designs.  Harley will sort the emissions problems out, S&amp;S would have been better served by using their R&amp;D cash to build along existing lines, not pushing it&#8217;s own agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-53310</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/#comment-53310</guid>
		<description>Howard &amp; S&amp;S,

The engine looks great in the Big Dog...very purpose-built looking with the performance to match.  Looking forward to seeing it in person

good job &amp; nice article by Kevin Cameron in CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard &amp; S&amp;S,</p>
<p>The engine looks great in the Big Dog&#8230;very purpose-built looking with the performance to match.  Looking forward to seeing it in person</p>
<p>good job &amp; nice article by Kevin Cameron in CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxterblue</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-52666</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxterblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/#comment-52666</guid>
		<description>Glad to see S&amp;S thinking outside the box. 56 degree V and side by side rods. Next generation 60 degrees and water cooling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see S&amp;S thinking outside the box. 56 degree V and side by side rods. Next generation 60 degrees and water cooling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prester John</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-52664</link>
		<dc:creator>Prester John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/11/27/ss-x-wedge-v-twin-engine/#comment-52664</guid>
		<description>Looks and styling?  This is just the genric version, guys.  I&#039;m sure S&amp;S will work with their various OEM customers to come up with unique, high style cosmetics for every part that don&#039;t affect EPA.

TCS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks and styling?  This is just the genric version, guys.  I&#8217;m sure S&amp;S will work with their various OEM customers to come up with unique, high style cosmetics for every part that don&#8217;t affect EPA.</p>
<p>TCS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
