<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cruiser and Racer Motorcycle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoyt</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/#comment-31386</link>
		<dc:creator>hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1086#comment-31386</guid>
		<description>this bike will still not handle in corners the way it should with that rear tire.

As far as I know, an all-around bike designed to handle well will have to use a 200 (maximum) rear tire.

Even confederate confesses the hellcat&#039;s handling is negatively impacted with its  240 rear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this bike will still not handle in corners the way it should with that rear tire.</p>
<p>As far as I know, an all-around bike designed to handle well will have to use a 200 (maximum) rear tire.</p>
<p>Even confederate confesses the hellcat&#8217;s handling is negatively impacted with its  240 rear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kneeslider</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/#comment-31252</link>
		<dc:creator>kneeslider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1086#comment-31252</guid>
		<description>You guys may be right about the way it looks like a toy with the proportions out of whack, but I thought the proportions were off the first time I saw the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2005/12/12/victory-vision-800cc-parallel-twin-automatic-concept/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Victory Vison 800&lt;/a&gt;, too. That one supposedly works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys may be right about the way it looks like a toy with the proportions out of whack, but I thought the proportions were off the first time I saw the <a href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2005/12/12/victory-vision-800cc-parallel-twin-automatic-concept/" rel="nofollow">Victory Vison 800</a>, too. That one supposedly works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/#comment-31233</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1086#comment-31233</guid>
		<description>upon reflection, I&#039;ll go with borkonnen here, and run with his statement...

any chance that this guy&#039;s using a picture of some hasboro type motorcycle toy in his promo?  or at least for insperation for the design?

the more I look, the more things seem out of whack - those mirrors are bigger than the headlight or instrument cluster, and nearly as big as the rear sprocket...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>upon reflection, I&#8217;ll go with borkonnen here, and run with his statement&#8230;</p>
<p>any chance that this guy&#8217;s using a picture of some hasboro type motorcycle toy in his promo?  or at least for insperation for the design?</p>
<p>the more I look, the more things seem out of whack &#8211; those mirrors are bigger than the headlight or instrument cluster, and nearly as big as the rear sprocket&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borkonnen</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/#comment-31164</link>
		<dc:creator>Borkonnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1086#comment-31164</guid>
		<description>With it&#039;s fat front tire, peculiar gas tank and engine cover it&#039;s shaped like a chinese plastic toy motorcycle. There is no way it can be compared with Roland Sand&#039;s &quot;No Regrets&quot; custom racer.

I agree though that the long forks are an obsolete design pest among custom builders and it&#039;s good things are begining to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With it&#8217;s fat front tire, peculiar gas tank and engine cover it&#8217;s shaped like a chinese plastic toy motorcycle. There is no way it can be compared with Roland Sand&#8217;s &#8220;No Regrets&#8221; custom racer.</p>
<p>I agree though that the long forks are an obsolete design pest among custom builders and it&#8217;s good things are begining to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/06/20/cruiser-and-racer-motorcycle/#comment-31139</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1086#comment-31139</guid>
		<description>you can&#039;t see the engine because there isn&#039;t an engine.  this thing is the rich geeks version of schoolboy doodles.  I like how this future engine has a torque figure, but no rpm # at which it hits...maybe it&#039;s a 50cc running 1047.3Bar boost?  or a 8100cc that redlines at 168rpm... 

it looks like most numbers have been pulled from thin air, too - a 22 inch billet rear running dual discs on a 435lb bike? good thing there&#039;s no engine yet, cause otherwise that weight figure will be a pipe dream!

chain pull will play havoc with the rear, too - unless the pivot is much lower than it appears...and I don&#039;t see how they plan on cooling the engine, or even fitting it in there (my quick math shows about 30 inches between the front and rear tires)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can&#8217;t see the engine because there isn&#8217;t an engine.  this thing is the rich geeks version of schoolboy doodles.  I like how this future engine has a torque figure, but no rpm # at which it hits&#8230;maybe it&#8217;s a 50cc running 1047.3Bar boost?  or a 8100cc that redlines at 168rpm&#8230; </p>
<p>it looks like most numbers have been pulled from thin air, too &#8211; a 22 inch billet rear running dual discs on a 435lb bike? good thing there&#8217;s no engine yet, cause otherwise that weight figure will be a pipe dream!</p>
<p>chain pull will play havoc with the rear, too &#8211; unless the pivot is much lower than it appears&#8230;and I don&#8217;t see how they plan on cooling the engine, or even fitting it in there (my quick math shows about 30 inches between the front and rear tires)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

