<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Morning Special Triumph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/05/30/sunday-morning-special-triumph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/05/30/sunday-morning-special-triumph/</link>
	<description>Motorcycle News for Positive People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/05/30/sunday-morning-special-triumph/#comment-40039</link>
		<dc:creator>jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1047#comment-40039</guid>
		<description>I have to agree about the headlight. The rest of the lines of the bike &quot;flow&quot;. A round light in a shallow bucket would work better, imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree about the headlight. The rest of the lines of the bike &#8220;flow&#8221;. A round light in a shallow bucket would work better, imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/05/30/sunday-morning-special-triumph/#comment-20246</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1047#comment-20246</guid>
		<description>heh! If you&#039;re gonna base opinion on the whole bike because of the headlight.... wow. Much nicer than the sportster based bike. I think I&#039;m beginning to see what the marketing guys are up against, now.

My question: would bikes like these be a hit in America? What if the *entire* motorcycle was new? Not just a rebuit motor in a new frame...

dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh! If you&#8217;re gonna base opinion on the whole bike because of the headlight&#8230;. wow. Much nicer than the sportster based bike. I think I&#8217;m beginning to see what the marketing guys are up against, now.</p>
<p>My question: would bikes like these be a hit in America? What if the *entire* motorcycle was new? Not just a rebuit motor in a new frame&#8230;</p>
<p>dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2006/05/30/sunday-morning-special-triumph/#comment-17177</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekneeslider.com/?p=1047#comment-17177</guid>
		<description>So why is it that they can do a nice job with the Harley, but the Triumph is hideous? Those headlights... ugh...

Still, it&#039;s always nice to see a custom Triumph, even if I don&#039;t like the style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why is it that they can do a nice job with the Harley, but the Triumph is hideous? Those headlights&#8230; ugh&#8230;</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s always nice to see a custom Triumph, even if I don&#8217;t like the style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

